From: Radu Moisan <radu.moisan@intel.com>
To: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] iputils: Upgrade to v20121221
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:46:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51DBF7FC.7090208@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51DB610A.40306@linux.intel.com>
On 07/09/2013 04:02 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 07/08/2013 03:21 AM, Radu Moisan wrote:
>> Removed obsolete patches
>> Header for arping changed. New author added.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan <radu.moisan@intel.com>
>> ---
>> .../files/debian/add-icmp-return-codes.diff | 43
>> --------------------
>> .../iputils/files/debian/fix-arping-timeouts.diff | 26 ------------
>> .../files/debian/fix-dead-host-ping-stats.diff | 16 --------
>> .../iputils/files/debian/targets.diff | 14 +++----
>> .../iputils/files/debian/use_gethostbyname2.diff | 36
>> ++++++++--------
>> .../{iputils_s20101006.bb => iputils_s20121221.bb} | 12 ++----
>> 6 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)
>> delete mode 100644
>> meta/recipes-extended/iputils/files/debian/add-icmp-return-codes.diff
>> delete mode 100644
>> meta/recipes-extended/iputils/files/debian/fix-arping-timeouts.diff
>> delete mode 100644
>> meta/recipes-extended/iputils/files/debian/fix-dead-host-ping-stats.diff
>> rename meta/recipes-extended/iputils/{iputils_s20101006.bb =>
>> iputils_s20121221.bb} (82%)
>>
>
> This seems to fail for lib64 multilib build:
Ok, found the problem, with this version they've enabled capability
support (with libcap) by default, so libcap must be added in DEPENDS,
unless we want to patch it not to use capability support by default. (??)
Speaking of things enabled by default, they also enabled GNUTLS, that's
why initially I submitted the patch with GNUTLS. Do we want to use
default (upstream) configuration with gnutls?
Radu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-09 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-08 10:21 [PATCH v4 0/9] Package Upgrades Radu Moisan
2013-07-08 10:21 ` [PATCH 1/9] iputils: Upgrade to v20121221 Radu Moisan
2013-07-09 1:02 ` Saul Wold
2013-07-09 11:46 ` Radu Moisan [this message]
2013-07-08 10:21 ` [PATCH 2/9] elfutils: Upgrade to v0.155 Radu Moisan
2013-07-08 10:21 ` [PATCH 3/9] rxvt-unicode: Upgrade to v9.18 Radu Moisan
2013-07-08 10:21 ` [PATCH 4/9] ed: Upgrade to v1.8 Radu Moisan
2013-07-08 10:22 ` [PATCH 5/9] libdmx: Upgrade to v1.1.3 Radu Moisan
2013-07-08 10:22 ` [PATCH 6/9] apr: Upgrade to v1.4.8 Radu Moisan
2013-07-08 10:22 ` [PATCH 7/9] apr-util: Upgrade to v1.5.2 Radu Moisan
2013-07-08 10:22 ` [PATCH 8/9] diffutils: Upgrade to v3.3 Radu Moisan
2013-07-08 23:36 ` Saul Wold
2013-07-08 10:22 ` [PATCH 9/9] usbutils: Upgrade to v007 Radu Moisan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-07-05 14:47 [PATCH v3 0/9] Package Upgrades Radu Moisan
2013-07-05 14:47 ` [PATCH 1/9] iputils: Upgrade to v20121221 Radu Moisan
2013-07-05 16:14 ` Burton, Ross
2013-07-08 10:22 ` Radu Moisan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51DBF7FC.7090208@intel.com \
--to=radu.moisan@intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=sgw@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox