From: Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia@windriver.com>
To: "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] nss: add version 3.15.1
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:27:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51DE96A8.7020106@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJTo0La1Npg5YwJ8ihzfbZvepOvg2HdjkbK_ir6WOvBVHBBkcQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 683 bytes --]
On 07/11/2013 07:14 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 11 July 2013 11:45, Phil Blundell <pb@pbcl.net> wrote:
>> I think you could still legitimately question whether having recipes in
>> oe-core that are "just for LSB" is sensible and/or desirable, not least
>> because dangling libraries that don't have any users are hard to test.
> I was just pondering the idea of a "meta-lsb"...
The reason why I choose to put nss into oe-core is I found nspr in oe-core.
They both used for lsb-test and come from mozilla.
Anyone has a better idea about where to put?
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/NSS
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/NSPR
//Hongxu
>
> Ross
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1743 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-11 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-10 8:03 [PATCH V2 0/5] add nss for LSB library check Hongxu Jia
2013-07-10 8:03 ` [PATCH 1/5] nspr: add native version Hongxu Jia
2013-07-10 8:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] packagegroup-core-lsb: add nss for LSB library check Hongxu Jia
2013-07-10 8:03 ` [PATCH 3/5] nss: add version 3.15.1 Hongxu Jia
2013-07-11 10:40 ` Burton, Ross
2013-07-11 10:41 ` Burton, Ross
2013-07-11 10:45 ` Phil Blundell
2013-07-11 11:14 ` Burton, Ross
2013-07-11 11:27 ` Hongxu Jia [this message]
2013-07-11 11:34 ` Phil Blundell
2013-07-11 13:41 ` Burton, Ross
2013-07-10 8:03 ` [PATCH 4/5] nss: create checksum files for the nss libraries Hongxu Jia
2013-07-12 12:39 ` Burton, Ross
2013-07-12 12:45 ` Hongxu Jia
2013-07-10 8:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] nss: fix incorrect shebang line of perl script Hongxu Jia
2013-07-11 8:39 ` Trevor Woerner
2013-07-11 8:58 ` Hongxu Jia
2013-07-11 9:23 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-07-11 9:28 ` Hongxu Jia
2013-07-11 12:04 ` [PATCH V3 0/5] add nss for LSB library check (cover letter only) Hongxu Jia
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-07-09 12:30 [PATCH 0/5]add nss for LSB library check Hongxu Jia
2013-07-09 12:30 ` [PATCH 3/5] nss: add version 3.15.1 Hongxu Jia
2013-07-09 12:44 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-07-09 13:29 ` Hongxu Jia
2013-07-09 13:38 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-07-09 13:41 ` Khem Raj
2013-07-10 1:26 ` Hongxu Jia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51DE96A8.7020106@windriver.com \
--to=hongxu.jia@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=ross.burton@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox