From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10AC06B216 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2013 07:45:13 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,677,1367996400"; d="scan'208";a="346474058" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.13.97]) ([10.255.13.97]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2013 07:47:42 -0700 Message-ID: <51E55D0C.4080605@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 07:47:40 -0700 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Iorga, Cristian" References: <1373984927-21039-1-git-send-email-cristian.iorga@intel.com> <1373985229.2651.84.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign> <969F26A8BAB325438E7EB80D3C3134FB16C05A76@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <969F26A8BAB325438E7EB80D3C3134FB16C05A76@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com> Cc: "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/2] BlueZ 5 experimental recipes X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:47:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/16/2013 07:36 AM, Iorga, Cristian wrote: > " why having it be so is not a very good thing." > > Sorry, I did not understood this part. > > Judging by my investigation, is RREPLACES needed or not? > I believe that RREPLACES is not needed, it could cause problems if a feed builds the bluez5 packages but does not want to use them, without the RREPLACES it requires a conscious effort on the target to get the update. The upgrade case is exactly why we should not have RREPLACES. Sau! > /Cristian > > -----Original Message----- > From: Phil Blundell [mailto:pb@pbcl.net] > Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 5:34 PM > To: Iorga, Cristian > Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V3 0/2] BlueZ 5 experimental recipes > > On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 17:28 +0300, Cristian Iorga wrote: >> Observe my investigation below in order to decide if RREPLACES is needed. >> Conclusion: BlueZ 5.x will be eventually an upgrade path for an >> already installed embedded device. As such, RREPLACES is needed for a system-wide upgrade. > > It wasn't very obvious to me that these results make a compelling case for bluez4 needing to RREPLACE bluez5. Indeed, this section: > > root@qemux86:~# opkg install bluez5 > Multiple replacers for bluez5, using first one (bluez4). > Package bluez4 is already installed on root. > root@qemux86:~# opkg list-installed | grep bluez > bluez4 - 4.101-r6.0 > libasound-module-bluez - 4.101-r6.0 > > ... seems to illustrate (modulo the usual amount of opkg craziness) why having it be so is not a very good thing. > > p. > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > >