From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B54C6B3FA for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 05:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r6U5m419020001 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 29 Jul 2013 22:48:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.233] (128.224.162.233) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.342.3; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 22:48:03 -0700 Message-ID: <51F75398.901@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:48:08 +0800 From: ChenQi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Phil Blundell References: <1375111593.13247.41.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign> In-Reply-To: <1375111593.13247.41.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign> X-Originating-IP: [128.224.162.233] Cc: Zhangle.Yang@windriver.com, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 08/10] irda-utils: make /etc/sysconfig writable in read-only rootfs X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 05:48:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/29/2013 11:26 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 10:33 +0800, Qi.Chen@windriver.com wrote: >> From: Chen Qi >> >> This diretory needs to be writable, the following error will appear >> at system start-up. >> >> /etc/rc5.d/S20irattach: /etc/sysconfig/irda: Read-only file system > The whole chunk of code in that script that's trying to write > to /etc/sysconfig seems bogus. I think the right fix is just to delete > it rather than trying to provide a a volatile implementation > of /etc/sysconfig (which seems like a contradiction in terms). > > p. > > After a second look at the script, I think you're right. Thank your for pointing it out :) I'll fix this in my V3 patchset. Best Regards, Chen Qi >