From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Qi.Chen@windriver.com
Cc: Zhangle.Yang@windriver.com, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] buildtools-tarball: unset OECORE_NATIVE_SYSROOT
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:12:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51FAA515.6050302@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bc3108ce8eea753d38dc70187fface31e6178e71.1375073005.git.Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
On 07/29/2013 06:50 PM, Qi.Chen@windriver.com wrote:
> From: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
>
> When building a qemu image inside the environment created by the
> buildtools-tarball, the qemu image cannot be started, as the runqemu
> script uses the tunctl binary which cannot be found inside the sysroot
> directory of the buildtools-tarball.
>
> The buildtools-tarball is inherently a tool set instead of a fully
> functional SDK, so leaving the OECORE_NATIVE_SYSROOT variable in the
> environment will mess things up.
>
> However, we do need a line of 'OECORE_NATIVE_SYSROOT=xxx' in the environment
> setup script so that the SDK can be extracted and relocated correctly.
>
Where is this being processed, can could be done as a since comment in
the the environment-setup script instead of exporting and unseting it?
Sau!
> That's why this patch unsets the variable instead of removing it from the
> environment setup script.
>
> [YOCTO #4939]
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
> ---
> meta/recipes-core/meta/buildtools-tarball.bb | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/meta/buildtools-tarball.bb b/meta/recipes-core/meta/buildtools-tarball.bb
> index 9771497..1f8f142 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-core/meta/buildtools-tarball.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/meta/buildtools-tarball.bb
> @@ -59,7 +59,11 @@ create_sdk_files_append () {
> script=${1:-${SDK_OUTPUT}/${SDKPATH}/environment-setup-${SDK_SYS}}
> touch $script
> echo 'export PATH=${SDKPATHNATIVE}${bindir_nativesdk}:$PATH' >> $script
> + # OECORE_NATIVE_SYSROOT variable needs to be in $script so that the
> + # relocate script can find the ld-linux.so.
> echo 'export OECORE_NATIVE_SYSROOT="${SDKPATHNATIVE}"' >> $script
> -
> + # buildtools-tarball is inherently a tool set instead of a fully functional SDK.
> + # Leaving OECORE_NATIVE_SYSROOT in environment will mess things up.
> + echo 'unset OECORE_NATIVE_SYSROOT' >> $script
> toolchain_create_sdk_version ${SDK_OUTPUT}/${SDKPATH}/version-${SDK_SYS}
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-01 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-30 1:50 [PATCH 0/1] buildtools-tarball: unset OECORE_NATIVE_SYSROOT Qi.Chen
2013-07-30 1:50 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Qi.Chen
2013-08-01 18:12 ` Saul Wold [this message]
2013-08-02 1:54 ` ChenQi
2013-08-02 2:08 ` ChenQi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51FAA515.6050302@linux.intel.com \
--to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Qi.Chen@windriver.com \
--cc=Zhangle.Yang@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox