From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-f195.google.com (mail-pf1-f195.google.com [209.85.210.195]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7107FD62 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 17:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf1-f195.google.com with SMTP id w2so1418996pfd.3 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 09:05:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=g4MWHiAUwrcn1tYlhrtXjh8+uD+SVggdLEg3tPUsRIs=; b=C+Ze7Era4Nzyui/GnVfBONc8RnkhHcv0tyaqWgk5mIcgicvNUP4/m9Nm5fffGM97QV qCZhQ5Vf5is6XIfwqDw782Q5gi8dJcA3ssuAAfbpDSOppRqZEmL5Zb9GJBO74R+gt7NM oWw7mKmYDoMRS6D02TdZijhCV3R4WMgx9U7Iy2lQbbiyIGnOpn9ifSxvhtRZwMDyUAw2 Wsmx6xUgQmP2mEXmiq6eK36pfbBtrglxYXV39DF1R+PFvh2sVZp4hJNN7SkTpWjvOZ+f 8krhA3f0xUzSKILHGq2q86AkxxIFl1IC1VosQql+kL5G9PowUsUvsnMDHC7LZ0dbby+5 sD4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g4MWHiAUwrcn1tYlhrtXjh8+uD+SVggdLEg3tPUsRIs=; b=FXunaHjrz8kd9i+682s/XvmgowY+K5aroGEw1xXS29/IMhD+pDq7NPEI92shancI7r ySjAP0yCsxAy18tUPCTO9gHU8dnOMNiDedjqXT7RGbnvc6/V3Kv4NR1dHbp6bRvn6qHD Apuu707pdCVhMXz7epuH2LyjZlMB0v8iNB1Jj7jDCenynbWqtnYfFcm94dWl6+jrAOty lKnicWW4HjKdLR/2i30pJF57Z1wd2DlC4Xhm+9xUcucrJS7WeSMfPJN5mdj003O+bGaf Aw91Z/eFvjdlQFgUypoolA3KPZWiQnrt3I1q20LQrpQfIBsmpLh9dPDJ/xweGGvxwPzt O+pA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXAT6+9QzFC1ibOKSu8Jr4YfkvYIEwTRJf6sM1cE+CRADvzAsJ5 jweYBphsP9iGOwWK7/idyeriz4+BfAo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx5+V1XzlbsZ12hCW2q41SpJwlaQKa3iN7aim9tbWe2SvNjH1uRgSD9cKVQql7bjbcp0n04nQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:5a23:: with SMTP id o35mr5088381pgb.4.1579885511496; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 09:05:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:646:9200:4e0:5dac:ba30:48e4:cb20? ([2601:646:9200:4e0:5dac:ba30:48e4:cb20]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h3sm6880234pji.9.2020.01.24.09.05.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 09:05:10 -0800 (PST) To: Ross Burton , Denys Dmytriyenko , Andre McCurdy References: <1579813185-1950-1-git-send-email-denis@denix.org> <6f6a74c1-948e-e6f2-303b-639a08111d64@intel.com> <20200123224340.GG4735@denix.org> <0620f17c-53ca-7e95-1607-621507baedd8@intel.com> From: Khem Raj Organization: HIMVIS LLC Message-ID: <51f70cda-9ddf-ea8c-e8a9-3a3f69db8167@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 09:05:09 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0620f17c-53ca-7e95-1607-621507baedd8@intel.com> Cc: Jon Mason , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer , Denys Dmytriyenko Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm-trusted-firmware: add upstream version 2.2 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 17:05:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 1/24/20 3:42 AM, Ross Burton wrote: > On 23/01/2020 22:43, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: >>> Such as all the various cortex etc CPU tuning files? >> >> LOL! :) Of course, since ARM is such an inferior arch to x86. >> Otherwise we >> should move everything that is not needed by qemux86 to meta-intel... >> JK :) > > I almost pre-empted this comment in my reply because I knew it was > coming. :) > > Personally, not a terrible idea.  The slight difference is that > meta-intel is *Intel's* BSP and we don't share stuff like > firmware/drivers with AMD. > > Ross it will be good to find what the overlap will be, is it something that BSPs can use with minimum changes, or are we providing a template that will be copied over and housed in form of bbappends or bbs. I am not familiar enough to assess that. Perhaps it would be good to limit this to arm compatible machines, secondly, there is a point in having it in OE-Core if meta-arm is limiting itself to arm provided BSPs alone. I think it will be good to have a platform supported in core to be able to test it, between qemu and beaglebone, I guess it is not used. Or pehaps it is and we do not use it, so that change would be good to have as well.