From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5C86BA7D for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 19:09:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r7QJ9Acs007546 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 26 Aug 2013 12:09:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.146.67] (128.224.146.67) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.347.0; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 12:09:09 -0700 Message-ID: <521BA7CB.7070206@windriver.com> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 15:08:59 -0400 From: Bruce Ashfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Elvis Dowson References: <20130825104341.a5c5c4a29245e5c988b774ab8f895ac5.305c945aa2.wbe@email15.secureserver.net> <835D4942-DCEA-4634-9822-24ADDCAD8DF7@gmail.com> <092BF80A-B02A-4506-840E-2EEEE48CE298@gmail.com> <4AC41A5E-073D-4973-82BD-F94A8B168F34@gmail.com> <521AA95A.8000803@windriver.com> <7DBFB4EE-4727-422F-8815-D801827A37C9@gmail.com> <521AD896.3000503@windriver.com> <6324D287-2CA2-4A88-AFF4-58CABE82B2CC@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6324D287-2CA2-4A88-AFF4-58CABE82B2CC@gmail.com> Cc: OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List Subject: Re: QEMU with ARM Cortex A9 with hard float configuration - Kernel panic X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 19:09:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 13-08-26 11:49 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > On Aug 26, 2013, at 8:24 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >> Perhaps the zynq machine definition is the right way to go, since nearly >> enough support is mainline (in both qemu and the kernel), and we can >> motivate the rest into their respective upstreams. >> >> If someone can come up the right conf files, and machine definition, I >> can pretty easily support it in linux-yocto. > > Could you tell me what's steps I need to follow, to add a new machine > definition and support to the linux-yocto kernel? Are you interested in something from scratch, versus something that isn't already partially in the tree (like qemuarma9) ? We've got a few docs and tutorials, but I can also help step you through the process to assist the existing material. Bruce > > I'd like to learn how to do this! > > Best regards, > > Elvis Dowson >