From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from p3plsmtpa09-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa09-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.193.232]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877796AB7D for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 21:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.65.10] ([66.41.60.82]) by p3plsmtpa09-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with id HZob1m0031mTNtu01Zobnh; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:48:37 -0700 Message-ID: <521BCD34.8090003@pabigot.com> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:48:36 -0500 From: "Peter A. Bigot" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130804 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Saul Wold References: <1377251290-4290-1-git-send-email-lpapp@kde.org> <521B9698.7030803@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <521B9698.7030803@linux.intel.com> Cc: openembedded-core Subject: Re: [PATCH] u-boot: update to 2013.07 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 21:48:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I can confirm this also works with the Gumstix Overo in a layer bbappend that used SRC_URI_append_overo for additional patches. Thanks to you both for getting it merged. I did come up with a question, though. The recipe uses: PV = "v2013.07+git${SRCPV}" which creates an informative but ugly ${BPN}. I'd like to use something like: FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${BPN}:" in the bbappend to simplify updates, but I don't want to have a directory named u-boot-v2013.07+gitAUTOINC+62c175fbb8. For linux-yocto, this is solved through introduction of ${LINUX_VERSION} allowing ${PN}-${LINUX_VERSION}. Is there reason to create a parallel UBOOT_VERSION? Is there reason to have some way to access the default ${PV} inferred from the recipe name before the base recipe overrode it? (Is there already some way to get that value?) Is there a better approach than bbappend-in-layer that I should use for adding patches required for a specific u-boot machine? Peter On 08/26/2013 12:55 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > On 08/23/2013 09:57 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote: >> Any update? It would be nice not to miss the freeze ... ;-) >> > This has been merged, and I was informed by the QA team that it works > correctly for the mpc8315e-rdb and beagleboard, but NOT the > beagleboard XM.