From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25E46BFA6 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 04:40:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r8A4euId023318 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 9 Sep 2013 21:40:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.22.38] (128.224.22.38) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.347.0; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 21:40:55 -0700 Message-ID: <522EA2D6.7030805@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:40:54 -0400 From: Randy MacLeod User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jhuang0 References: <1378721444-22545-1-git-send-email-jackie.huang@windriver.com> <1378722078.6940.124.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign> <522DA232.70900@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <522DA232.70900@windriver.com> X-Originating-IP: [128.224.22.38] Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pulseaudio: avoid gcc ICE by omitting code TEMPORARILY X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 04:40:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 13-09-09 06:25 AM, jhuang0 wrote: > > > On 9/9/2013 6:21 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: >> On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 18:10 +0800, jackie.huang@windriver.com wrote: >>> From: Randy MacLeod >>> >>> It's a FYI patch for anyone who might be having the same problem. >>> >>> pulseaudio-4.0 causes an internal compiler error. Temporarily >>> avoid the build error be omitting the code that makes the >>> compiler fail until the compiler ICE is addressed. >> >> Please mention the GCC bug number for this ice so that it's easy to >> establish when it has indeed been addressed. > > Sorry, I don't have the bug number. > > Randy, > > Do you have one for this? Not yet. In fact I can't reproduce it using just oe-core so I think my report via Jackie is a false alarm. Sorry about that. // Randy > > Thanks, > Jackie > >> >> p. >> >> >> >> > -- # Randy MacLeod. SMTS, Linux, Wind River Direct: 613.963.1350