From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D4C60579 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 20:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Sep 2013 13:33:05 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,900,1371106800"; d="scan'208";a="403059468" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.15.78]) ([10.255.15.78]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Sep 2013 13:36:06 -0700 Message-ID: <52337736.1070906@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:36:06 -0700 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130805 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hans Beckerus References: <1378825041-20190-1-git-send-email-hans.beckerus@gmail.com> <5231F548.6010801@linux.intel.com> <52322D8B.7080406@gmail.com> <52324915.6030708@gmail.com> <1379062359.3484.243.camel@ted> <1379074896.3484.262.camel@ted> <52335040.101@linux.intel.com> <5233538E.9020404@gmail.com> <523367D6.4050604@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <523367D6.4050604@gmail.com> Cc: openembedded-core Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] libtool: fix resolve of lt_sysroot X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 20:36:10 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 09/13/2013 12:30 PM, Hans Beckerus wrote: > On 2013-09-13 8:03, Hans Beckerus wrote: >> On 2013-09-13 7:49, Saul Wold wrote: >>> On 09/13/2013 06:29 AM, Hans Beckérus wrote: <> >>>>>> >>>>> Agree. Since all my patch did initially was to make sure gcc was >>>>> queried when --with-libtool-sysroot was not specified this is the only >>>>> possible reason I can think of that causes it to break like this. And >>>>> there is only one side on this coin. The result before the patch if a >>>>> sysroot *was* specified is the same now also after the patch. I will >>>>> get back later with a status update on my world build. Will probably >>>>> take all weekend since it is a simple dual-core ARM mini-server :( >>>>> I am not really concerned about what release this is targeting. I >>>>> consider this a workaround until I can dig deeper into what is >>>>> actually going wrong. My primary goal is to make sure that the SDK >>>>> does not break as it did before when installed in different paths. Of >>>>> course that must not affect legacy features so hopefully this >>>>> workaround eliminates that. >>>>> > The current patch looks good so far. I am still running a world build on > my "failing" host and no errors as of yet. The packages that failed > before has now passed. Should I make a v5 out of this and then someone > else (Saul?) can give it an extra spin? > Sure, I will give it a local test and if it passes here I can throw it on the Autobuilder over the weekend and see what happens. Sau! >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> Hans >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> Richard >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >