From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <Wenzong.Fan@windriver.com>
Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11])
	by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596A86D46F
	for <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:13:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hcb.corp.ad.wrs.com
	[147.11.189.41])
	by mail.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id rABADFaZ023297
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL);
	Mon, 11 Nov 2013 02:13:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [128.224.162.200] (128.224.162.200) by ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com
	(147.11.189.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.347.0;
	Mon, 11 Nov 2013 02:13:15 -0800
Message-ID: <5280ADB9.4050802@windriver.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:13:13 +0800
From: wenzong fan <wenzong.fan@windriver.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
	rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <cover.1383821844.git.wenzong.fan@windriver.com>
	<CAJTo0LZHwv3jbAP_utqA-RUALdE_R7OtpUQnzaWU67qup47fHQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<527C9C6F.4050509@windriver.com> <1383898719.6271.293.camel@ted>
In-Reply-To: <1383898719.6271.293.camel@ted>
Cc: OE-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] udev: ship source files to related dbg package
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:13:15 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 11/08/2013 04:18 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 16:10 +0800, wenzong fan wrote:
>> On 11/07/2013 07:12 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>>> On 7 November 2013 11:03,  <wenzong.fan@windriver.com> wrote:
>>>> From: Wenzong Fan <wenzong.fan@windriver.com>
>>>>
>>>> Just ship these sources to their own dbg packages instead of udev-dbg:
>>>>
>>>>       libudev* -> libudev-dbg
>>>>       gudev*   -> libgudev-dbg
>>>>       others   -> udev-dbg
>>>
>>> Why do this?  Multiple -dbg packages could make sense in a recipe
>>> which builds a multi-gigabyte -dbg package (such as webkit) but what's
>>> the rationale for doing this in udev?
>>
>> Actually I don't know clear about why it needs three -dbg packages,
>> looks they have been there since very early commits of udev. I suspect
>> that udev/libudev/libgudev are independent each other, so they are
>> shipped into different packages (base/-dev/-dbg). This patch only ships
>> their source code to -dbg packages accordingly.
>
> We don't support multiple -dbg packages and this looks like an error.

Ok, another patch for removing the extra -dbg packages has been sent 
with subject:

     udev: remove libudev-dbg and libgudev-dbg

Thanks
Wenzong

>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
>