From: Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia@windriver.com>
To: <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Cc: saul.wold@intel.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/1] lib32-packagegroup-core-nfs: fix qa issue - install files into a shared area when those files already exist
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 21:39:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <528E0D2D.4010202@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac4248f073a505534a6fc9b7c9922b6781b85685.1384419666.git.hongxu.jia@windriver.com>
Hi All,
In this case, there are two 'packagegroup-core-nfs-server-1.0-r2.0.all.rpm'
in tmp/deploy/rpm/all. One is made by 'bitbake packagegroup-core-nfs ',
and the other is made by 'bitbake lib32-packagegroup-core-nfs '.
The last one overrode the previous triggered the QA check.
By default, packagegroup inherit allarch, which means the PACKAGE_ARCH
is "all".
Is it proper that 'all' packages are not supposed to be expanded into the
multilib versions?
There are some other packagegroup recipes have the similar issue.
//Hongxu
On 11/14/2013 05:02 PM, Hongxu Jia wrote:
> By default, packagegroup-core-nfs do not depend on a certain architecture,
> there will be qa warning while multilib enabled.
>
> $ bitbake packagegroup-core-nfs
> $ bitbake lib32-packagegroup-core-nfs
> ...
> WARNING: The recipe lib32-packagegroup-core-nfs is trying to install files into a shared area when those files already exist. Those files and their manifest location are:
> tmp/deploy/rpm/all/packagegroup-core-nfs-server-1.0-r2.0.all.rpm
> Matched in manifest-allarch-packagegroup-core-nfs.deploy-rpm
> Please verify which package should provide the above files.
> ...
>
> Set PACKAGE_ARCH with MACHINE_ARCH fixed this issue.
>
> [YOCTO #5532]
>
> Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia <hongxu.jia@windriver.com>
> ---
> meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-nfs.bb | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-nfs.bb b/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-nfs.bb
> index 531eceb..b57ef63 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-nfs.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-nfs.bb
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ LICENSE = "MIT"
> PR = "r2"
>
> inherit packagegroup
> +PACKAGE_ARCH = "${MACHINE_ARCH}"
>
> PACKAGES = "${PN}-server"
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-21 13:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-14 9:02 [PATCH 0/1]lib32-packagegroup-core-nfs: fix qa issue - install files into a shared area when those files already exist Hongxu Jia
2013-11-14 9:02 ` [PATCH 1/1] lib32-packagegroup-core-nfs: " Hongxu Jia
2013-11-21 13:39 ` Hongxu Jia [this message]
2013-11-21 13:50 ` [RFC PATCH " Richard Purdie
2013-11-22 12:21 ` Hongxu Jia
2013-11-22 12:27 ` Richard Purdie
2013-11-23 1:50 ` Hongxu Jia
2013-11-26 11:42 ` Hongxu Jia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=528E0D2D.4010202@windriver.com \
--to=hongxu.jia@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=saul.wold@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox