From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCE06D726 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rALEiY6u029367 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 06:44:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from Marks-MacBook-Pro.local (172.25.36.229) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.347.0; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 06:44:34 -0800 Message-ID: <528E1C52.2020307@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 08:44:34 -0600 From: Mark Hatle Organization: Wind River Systems User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <1385017169-22068-1-git-send-email-mark.hatle@windriver.com> <1385035973.23724.146.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign> <528DFB88.5080404@windriver.com> <1385037621.23724.149.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign> In-Reply-To: <1385037621.23724.149.camel@phil-desktop.brightsign> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] bind: add support for read-only rootfs X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:44:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/21/13, 6:40 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Thu, 2013-11-21 at 20:24 +0800, ChenQi wrote: >> The purpose is to disable bind in a read-only file system by default. >> But if user really wants it, they can set this value to 'yes'. > > I'm still struggling a bit to understand the reasoning here. Why would > you install bind in the first place if you didn't want it to be enabled? Why do people use core-image-sato, and then try to remove python? Sorry for the snarkiness, but that's what is being avoided here. I have to send these patches, due to the YP compliance guidelines, which is why this is an RFC and not something I'm suggesting for the actual oe-core.. (since the patch it depends on was not accepted.) --Mark > p. > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core >