From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>,
Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Cc: paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 000/122 V2] [dora] fixes for dora (cover leter only)
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 08:51:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A89825.7030303@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386771992.4332.76.camel@ted>
On 12/11/2013 06:26 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Can you confirm that all these patches have an equivalent change in
> master already? I can see some which I can't find equivalent changes in
> master for :(
>
I know there were a few explicit "for dora" only patches that do not
match in master since master moved forward in version.
Sau!
> You also do need to drop the "kernel: restore scripts in the sysroot"
> patch since it was reverted in master and is not a correct fix for
> anything.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
> On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 04:21 -0500, Robert Yang wrote:
>> * V2:
>> + Create the PULL based on oe-core
>> + Remove the 2 patches after more discussions with the submitter:
>> - native-python: bad interpreter error message
>> - Fix conflict between procps and base-files
>>
>> * V1 (Initial version)
>> + Main changes:
>> - Wic fixes
>> - Update the kernel to 3.10.17
>> - CVE fixes
>> - Other Bug fixes
>>
>> // Robert
>>
>> The following changes since commit c303f5ecf7cda1c3b8bb776a6800946c0487cd93:
>>
>> Revert "utils.bbclass: Fix override ordering for FILESPATH" (2013-12-03 12:55:47 +0000)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>> git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib robert/dora-next-oecore
>> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=robert/dora-next-oecore
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-11 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-11 9:21 [PATCH 000/122 V2] [dora] fixes for dora (cover leter only) Robert Yang
2013-12-11 14:26 ` Richard Purdie
2013-12-11 14:38 ` Richard Purdie
2013-12-11 17:18 ` Mark Hatle
2013-12-12 6:49 ` Robert Yang
2013-12-12 23:34 ` Richard Purdie
2013-12-12 23:43 ` Steve Sakoman
2013-12-13 2:02 ` Robert Yang
2013-12-13 2:00 ` Robert Yang
2013-12-13 6:08 ` Robert Yang
2013-12-13 9:26 ` Richard Purdie
2013-12-11 16:51 ` Saul Wold [this message]
2013-12-12 6:51 ` Robert Yang
2013-12-12 9:01 ` Robert Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52A89825.7030303@linux.intel.com \
--to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=liezhi.yang@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox