From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743C06DD22; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:09:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Dec 2013 12:05:13 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,496,1384329600"; d="scan'208";a="453172814" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.15.128]) ([10.255.15.128]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Dec 2013 12:08:52 -0800 Message-ID: <52AF5DD4.2090307@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:08:52 -0800 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Khem Raj , openembeded-devel , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [RFC] Binutils upgrade to 2.24 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 20:09:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/16/2013 12:03 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > Hi > > I have pushed a contrib branch for binutils 2.24 upgrade here > > http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/binutils-2.24 > > I have tested it on both uclibc/eglibc and qemu machines. But it would > be nice if > it gets more testing for machines I havent tested > I will throw it into the next MUT build for you. What's going on with the Python3 patches? Sau! > Thanks > > -Khem > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > >