Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ChenQi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
To: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>,
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rootfs_rpm.bbclass: make complementary packages not attempt-only
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 09:51:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52B0FF97.9080209@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52B05E23.4010402@windriver.com>

On 12/17/2013 10:22 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 12/17/13, 2:54 AM, Qi.Chen@windriver.com wrote:
>> From: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
>>
>> Installing complementary packages should not be attempt-only, otherwise,
>> errors would be hidden. For example, if we enable ptest distro feature,
>> and we add 'ptest-pkgs' to IMAGE_FEATRUES, then building a minimal image
>> would succeed without reporting any error. However, the systemd-ptest
>> is not installed because of lack of the perl package.
>
> Actually that was intentional under the original system design. Any of 
> the complementary packages were just that, complementary and not 
> required for the system to function properly.
>
> If dependencies, installation issues, etc caused problems, we could 
> happily skip them and continue on.  There are places (fairly few these 
> days) where the complementary packages are known to introduce a 
> failure, if not ignored.
>
> This happens primarily when the complementary set introduces a package 
> that has a conflict (RCONFLICT or a file level conflict) with 
> something installed in the required set.
>
> --Mark
>

Thanks for your explanation :)

Best Regards,
Chen Qi

>> Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
>> ---
>>   meta/classes/rootfs_rpm.bbclass |    4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/classes/rootfs_rpm.bbclass 
>> b/meta/classes/rootfs_rpm.bbclass
>> index 1a0c225..9a88330 100644
>> --- a/meta/classes/rootfs_rpm.bbclass
>> +++ b/meta/classes/rootfs_rpm.bbclass
>> @@ -170,8 +170,8 @@ rpm_setup_smart_target_config() {
>>
>>   rootfs_install_packages() {
>>       # Note - we expect the variables not set here to already have 
>> been set
>> -    export INSTALL_PACKAGES_RPM=""
>> -    export INSTALL_PACKAGES_ATTEMPTONLY_RPM="`cat $1`"
>> +    export INSTALL_PACKAGES_RPM="`cat $1`"
>> +    export INSTALL_PACKAGES_ATTEMPTONLY_RPM=""
>>       export INSTALL_PROVIDENAME_RPM=""
>>       export INSTALL_TASK_RPM="rootfs_install_packages"
>>       export INSTALL_COMPLEMENTARY_RPM="1"
>>
>
>
>



      reply	other threads:[~2013-12-18  1:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-17  8:54 [PATCH 0/1] rootfs_rpm.bbclass: make complementary packages not attempt-only Qi.Chen
2013-12-17  8:54 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Qi.Chen
2013-12-17 14:22   ` Mark Hatle
2013-12-18  1:51     ` ChenQi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52B0FF97.9080209@windriver.com \
    --to=qi.chen@windriver.com \
    --cc=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox