From: ChenQi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
To: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>,
<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] initscripts: split the functions script into a separate package
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 15:29:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CA5B4D.6050206@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52C72A60.9010702@linux.intel.com>
On 01/04/2014 05:23 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 01/01/2014 06:25 PM, Chen Qi wrote:
>> Many SysV init scripts need the /etc/init.d/functions script. But
>> this script is part of the initscripts package. As a result, the
>> initscripts package should always be installed into the system to
>> avoid errors when starting daemons. However, it makes no sense to
>> install the initscripts package into a systemd based image, because
>> what the init scripts provide has already been provided by the systemd.
>> On the other hand, the functions script might be still needed in a
>> systemd based image because other init scripts such as distcc might need
>> it.
>>
>> The above situation leads to a natural separation of the functions
>> script
>> from the initscripts package. And this patch does so. It separates the
>> functions script into initscripts-functions packages.
>>
>
> There seems to be a problem with the multi-lib build, please check
> this logfile for errors.
>
> http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-multilib/builds/71/steps/Building%20Images/logs/stdio
>
>
> Thanks
> Sau!
>
>
Thanks for pointing it out.
I've fixed it and sent out V3.
I also modified the patch a little so that it could apply to the latest
master cleanly.
Best Regards,
Chen Qi
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
>> ---
>> meta/recipes-core/initscripts/initscripts_1.0.bb | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/initscripts/initscripts_1.0.bb
>> b/meta/recipes-core/initscripts/initscripts_1.0.bb
>> index 5951e0c..ea28672 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-core/initscripts/initscripts_1.0.bb
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/initscripts/initscripts_1.0.bb
>> @@ -42,8 +42,12 @@ KERNEL_VERSION = ""
>> inherit update-alternatives
>> DEPENDS_append = " update-rc.d-native"
>>
>> -ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY = "90"
>> -ALTERNATIVE_${PN} = "functions"
>> +PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-functions"
>> +RDEPENDS_${PN} = "${PN}-functions"
>> +FILES_${PN}-functions = "${sysconfdir}/init.d/functions.${PN}"
>> +
>> +ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY_${PN}-functions = "90"
>> +ALTERNATIVE_${PN}-functions = "functions"
>> ALTERNATIVE_LINK_NAME[functions] = "${sysconfdir}/init.d/functions"
>>
>> HALTARGS ?= "-d -f"
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-06 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-02 2:25 [PATCH V2 0/2] Split the functions script into a separate package in initscripts Chen Qi
2014-01-02 2:25 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] initscripts: split the functions script into a separate package Chen Qi
2014-01-03 21:23 ` Saul Wold
2014-01-06 7:29 ` ChenQi [this message]
2014-01-02 2:25 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] Add missing RDEPENDS of initscripts-functions Chen Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52CA5B4D.6050206@windriver.com \
--to=qi.chen@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=sgw@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox