From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com (mail-ie0-f175.google.com [209.85.223.175]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74EB6A463 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 15:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id x13so3590719ief.6 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 07:38:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SrZCudYZDm5usEHR/QqghAzRyiPk2IIwCr7eu11xMy4=; b=Z59xE5DH6e1wMyyuR0KNgIbJnAJd6/2lkDMEyUZDa+h2SW+kJ2mSmMDr/cdW+ObZ+e BTCN4HLS7nIH3Tys/+d46Ld2l+pOrpr7CqqQQ4uUhX4weQpYzoSxBNay00N6kOd/Z+JL 69aBgoTuFdeKef04fIADTQf8HsjAkN4j9hhI5kGgHZ34ziAHCz2/NDIJ+DyMhzAo/nZO EE+PTBuQTyfxCvRVrG/Q7IH7mdw0MAir0Yv5AxddYLxwQG15UV9rDgXCJ7xO77332C7E qel3gX3R5uP83ztN/HKkElkFi0b617KOXpatzQyVMJXp1JnOjAtFGwdCA6G0v79I+5/9 egSA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmCvrTTRKWhRQJjXU3+UjQ8E96D//ZR3ToArJiX4fg/2zzjIKHM3SOfmdbcLQV3V4B8PfIA X-Received: by 10.42.61.4 with SMTP id s4mr2935927ich.58.1389281904623; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 07:38:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.141.83] (69-165-220-158.dsl.teksavvy.com. [69.165.220.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ft2sm8281304igb.5.2014.01.09.07.38.23 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Jan 2014 07:38:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52CEC26E.1080603@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 10:38:22 -0500 From: Trevor Woerner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <52CDDD3E.7040508@linaro.org> <52CE8075.8040700@communistcode.co.uk> <52CEBB27.10709@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: bug scrub - RFC X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 15:38:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/09/14 10:34, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Trevor Woerner > > wrote: > > On 01/09/14 05:56, Jack Mitchell wrote: > > On 08/01/14 23:20, Trevor Woerner wrote: > >> questions: > >> 1) Currently it has been suggested this should be a 2-day > event, should > >> these two days be during the week or over a weekend? In either > case, > >> which 2 days? > >> > > If it's two days long then why don't you do the best of both > worlds and > > have a Friday/Saturday or Sunday/Monday combination? > > I was thinking of doing it either fully during the week, or fully on a > weekend since my feeling is that most people either work with OE/Yocto > during the weekdays or on the weekend. There's nothing to say we > couldn't run this "bug scrub" during the week, then run a second "bug > scrub" 2 months from now on a weekend (or visa versa). > > > Maybe mix it, Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday. > > So we give in a single 'event' opportunity to both. > Okay, I can agree to that. How about targeting next weekend (Jan 17-18 2014). Would that be too soon?