Re: unmaintained layers

[Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>]

On 1/9/14, 3:45 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Trevor Woerner
> <trevor.woerner@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> At the last TSC meeting the topic of unmaintained layers came up. Here
>> is the sorted list of master layers from the layer index [1], would it
>> be possible for those in the know to indicate which layers are, or are
>> suspected of being, unmaintained?
>
> Wouldn't it be easier to do an initial sort based on commit activity ? Versus an
> opt-in query ?

I agree..  see below for mine..

>>
>>
>> meta-aarch64
>> meta-acer
>> meta-ada
>> meta-android
>> meta-angstrom
>> meta-arago-distro
>> meta-arago-extras
>> meta-asus
>> meta-aurora
>> meta-baryon
>> meta-beagleboard
>> meta-beagleboard-extras
>> meta-browser
>> meta-bug
>> meta-buglabs
>> meta-chicken
>> meta-chiefriver
>> meta-clutter
>> meta-crownbay
>> meta-crystalforest
>> meta-cubox
>> meta-darwin
>> meta-eca
>> meta-efikamx
>> meta-efl
>> meta-eldk
>> meta-emenlow
>> meta-erlang
>> meta-ettus
>> meta-filesystems
>> meta-fri2
>> meta-fsl-arm
>> meta-fsl-arm-extra
>> meta-fsl-demos
>> meta-fsl-ppc
>> meta-fso
>> meta-games
>> meta-geeksphone
>> meta-gir
>> meta-gnome
>> meta-gpe
>> meta-gstreamer10
>> meta-guacamayo
>> meta-gumstix
>> meta-gumstix-community
>> meta-gumstix-extras
>> meta-hamradio
>> meta-handheld
>> meta-hipos
>> meta-htc
>> meta-igep
>> meta-initramfs
>> meta-intel
>> meta-ivi
>> meta-jasperforest
>> meta-java
>> meta-kde
>> meta-kernel-dev
>
> maintained.
>
>> meta-kirkwood
>> meta-linaro
>> meta-linaro-toolchain
>> meta-lsi
>> meta-lxcbench
>> meta-measured
>> meta-mentor
>> meta-micro
>> meta-mingw
>> meta-minnow
>> meta-mono
>> meta-multimedia
>> meta-n450
>> meta-netbookpro
>> meta-netmodule
>> meta-networking
>> meta-nokia
>> meta-nslu2
>> meta-nuc
>> meta-oe
>> meta-openmoko
>> meta-openpandora
>> meta-openstack
>> meta-openstack-compute-deploy
>> meta-openstack-controller-deploy
>> meta-openstack-qemu
>
> All openstack layers are maintained.
>
>> meta-opie
>> meta-oracle-java
>> meta-osmocombb
>> meta-ouya
>> meta-palm
>> meta-perl
>> meta-picosam9
>> meta-qt3
>> meta-qt5
>> meta-raspberrypi
>> meta-realtime
>
> mantained
>
>> meta-ro-rootfs
>> meta-romley
>> meta-ros
>> meta-ruby
>> meta-samsung
>> meta-sdr
>> meta-security
>> meta-selinux

maintained

>> meta-shr
>> meta-shr-distro
>> meta-slugos
>> meta-smalltalk
>> meta-sourcery
>> meta-sugarbay
>> meta-sunxi
>> meta-sys940x
>> meta-systemd
>> meta-telephony
>> meta-telldus
>> meta-ti
>> meta-tlk
>> meta-tracing
>> meta-virtualization
>
> maintained
>
> But I can't say if I didn't miss something I maintain in the list,
> since it is long and I scanned
> it quickly.
>
> Bruce
>
>> meta-web-kiosk
>> meta-webos
>> meta-webos-ports
>> meta-webserver
>> meta-woce
>> meta-x10
>> meta-xfce
>> meta-xilinx
>> meta-xilinx-community
>> meta-yassl
>> meta-yocto
>> meta-yocto-bsp
>> meta-zynq
>> meta-zynq-milo
>> openembedded-core
>> toolchain-layer
>>
>>
>> Thank you for your input, and best regards,
>>      Trevor
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layers/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>
>
>