From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E3D6B565 for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 02:00:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0D20AwF001958 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 12 Jan 2014 18:00:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.224.162.226] (128.224.162.226) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.347.0; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 18:00:09 -0800 Message-ID: <52D348A5.6080808@windriver.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 10:00:05 +0800 From: Robert Yang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Koen Kooi , "Burton, Ross" References: <5b836adb7023cf075f9eb2246c7b2bbe420fd1cf.1388769973.git.liezhi.yang@windriver.com> <52CBFBB5.8030009@windriver.com> <8DE9C4FF-2468-4BE0-9FF3-8DC428F5A762@dominion.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: <8DE9C4FF-2468-4BE0-9FF3-8DC428F5A762@dominion.thruhere.net> Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gconf.bbclass: remove --disable-schemas-install X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 02:00:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/09/2014 02:33 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: > > Op 8 jan. 2014, om 17:12 heeft Burton, Ross het volgende geschreven: > >> On 7 January 2014 13:05, Robert Yang wrote: >>>> *Some* packages have migrated away from gconf to gsettings. Not all >>>> packages have done this, so anything still using gconf is now broken. >>>> Note that almost nothing in oe-core uses gsettings as we're still >>>> using the GTK+ 2 stack generally. >>> >>> Hi Ross, which recipe is failed, please ? >> >> A better question would be what package did you get this warning from? >> >> As I said, any recipe that did inherit gnome and still used GConf >> would be affected by your change. > > Which is over half of the meta-gnome recipes :( > Sounds bad, fortunately, it had been reverted. // Robert