From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98DA6C921 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 12:48:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Jan 2014 04:48:26 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,699,1384329600"; d="scan'208";a="470689553" Received: from vpopa-desktop.rb.intel.com (HELO [10.237.105.47]) ([10.237.105.47]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Jan 2014 04:48:25 -0800 Message-ID: <52DFBE2C.2080209@intel.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:48:44 +0200 From: Valentin Popa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Jansa References: <20140108173801.GB3709@jama> <52DFB95F.5080206@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <52DFB95F.5080206@intel.com> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mesa: upgrade to 9.2.2 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 12:48:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/22/2014 02:28 PM, Valentin Popa wrote: > On 01/08/2014 07:38 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> Hi, >> >> since this patch: >> commit 263e654e5d28fa7f6b0c8cc23f57a31448e88a40 >> Author: Valentin Popa >> Date: Wed Oct 30 12:27:39 2013 +0200 >> >> Mesa: upgrade to 9.2.2 >> >> * License is still MIT >> * removed patches were already merged or >> another solution was backported. >> >> I have to define MESA_EGL_NO_X11_HEADERS in qtbase and qtwebkit again to >> build them without xlib.h available (DISTRO without x11 in >> DISTRO_FEATURES). >> >> Are you sure that >> meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-9.1.6/0003-EGL-Mutate-NativeDisplayType-depending-on-config.patch >> >> was resolved in upstream? >> >> Regards, > Hi, > Sorry for this late response, > I removed that patch after testing wayland without X and worked. > I've tried yesterday to build qtbase (meta-qt5) to see exactly what's > the problem and determine if indeed part of that patch has to be > upstream, but it was failing for not finding libGL (which of course, > we don't build with mesa when I meant: libGL is not built together with the other mesa libraries when DISTRO_FEATURES_remove="x11" . > DISTRO_FEATURES_remove="x11". Just not having X11 in DISTRO_FEATURES > doesn't mean you'll not have it). > Can you please give me some info about your config vars or your > environment so I find out what's the problem!? (I'm trying to > reproduce the issue). > > Thanks for rising the issue!