From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com (mail-wg0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073976E89B for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 11:27:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id l18so4244357wgh.3 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 03:27:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5idMpMbEYGTE6uWwz1G0JQiG/YZo1zHJ0UXBXatCreU=; b=SeiV1hTH4rO0HCxlBJ4Tzuzyie+acjvv5WYK3dMhHLIgjp2FwRy2PAnyKKu8dvFZv6 YvBXQLNLkOBLUgO0i43SDlJkaLsZVCrhJvMfHDDfKrvsPKD+K0j7wetm/vWfxRskKV4K bXITkrQDSj292GMWxHWEHE3oeSt0GjARgUyqbRat+Pv7jSYL6blB7gYurCq8qLo+7lXY 1FPehaTuGAFuqpPoBg4zosCnqU3MF4+d4YJ55cf8WZwmZ241Aqe71O8zoObV84TgH+mT Jw37EJbWnTUaruJA1783HhBVfh0mxumXweoOlmlpYN66qEEBbtsoMw+8YJYYJhgnUbPP dIKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnEzkEyYrbwipyv6maxXX5ilE385zza6rL2gmA4RPiqB9F2LWdSX3Dpig1PoaDCUFZ9ULX3 X-Received: by 10.180.208.73 with SMTP id mc9mr12136411wic.54.1391513244672; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 03:27:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:610:612:0:5e51:4fff:fec8:7c15? ([2001:610:612:0:5e51:4fff:fec8:7c15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j9sm51816969wjz.13.2014.02.04.03.27.23 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Feb 2014 03:27:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52F0CE9B.7060601@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 12:27:23 +0100 From: Koen Kooi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador , Richard Purdie References: <1390297632-9966-1-git-send-email-koen.kooi@linaro.org> <1390312633.874.84.camel@ted> <52DE7E17.2090301@linaro.org> <1390316993.874.85.camel@ted> <52F0ABC7.1010908@linaro.org> <1391506325.22620.12.camel@ted> In-Reply-To: Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] package.bbclass: fix strip and split logic X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 11:27:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/04/2014 12:20 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello Richard, > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: >> On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 09:58 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> On 01/21/2014 04:09 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: >>>> On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 15:03 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >>>>> On 01/21/2014 02:57 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 10:47 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: >>>> I'm ok with it in principle but I'd like to see known build issues fixed >>>> before it goes in since red autobuilders cause me enough grief >>>> already ;-). >>> >>> What's the status on this? I know a fix went into meta-intel (albeit it >>> in a legally questionable way, but that's their problem) and the other >>> affected layers have received patches for it. >> >> The last test build I ran: >> >> http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-fsl-arm/builds/10/steps/BuildImages_1/logs/stdio >> >> still shows an error in the fsl-arm layer which I suspect is from this. >> I was hoping that could get fixed before it merges, its very much still >> in the queue though. >> >> I won't wait forever, equally, maintaining the green builds is proving >> to consume a lot of my time and if I can avoid adding more failures, I'd >> prefer to do so. > > I asked two fixes for Koen in the patch and I am awaiting this to > apply his patches. And I already said I'm not planning to jump through more hoops just to get this patch into OE-core. -- Koen Kooi Builds and Baselines | Release Manager Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs