From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1526E717 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:04:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1PD4bCU028894 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 05:04:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.224.162.226] (128.224.162.226) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.347.0; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 05:04:37 -0800 Message-ID: <530C94E4.1060303@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:04:36 +0800 From: Robert Yang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Burton, Ross" References: <1026f63b88e1781645e49bec5a1c53a4cd686adb.1393256563.git.liezhi.yang@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] archiver.bbclass: refactor it X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:04:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/25/2014 08:38 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 24 February 2014 15:56, Robert Yang wrote: >> 1) unpacked source: ARCHIVER_MODE[src] = "unpacked" > > Why does this re-archive the unpacked sources? When the source is a > tarball, there's already a tarball in DL_DIR. Only if the source > isn't a tarball does it need to be packed up. > Good idea, I will update it. // Robert > Ross > >