From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CACE606E0 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 06:01:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s3M61UUO001911 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 23:01:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.218] (128.224.162.218) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.169.1; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 23:01:29 -0700 Message-ID: <535605FA.6080905@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 14:02:34 +0800 From: ChenQi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: References: <5352B5E0.3080509@topic.nl> In-Reply-To: <5352B5E0.3080509@topic.nl> X-Originating-IP: [128.224.162.218] Subject: Re: nfs-utils does NOT rdepend on bash X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 06:01:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04/20/2014 01:44 AM, Mike Looijmans wrote: > To my surprise, a megabyte sized package "bash" was installed on > target when I installed nfs-utils to start the NFS server. > > Commit 664ae3dc52fd7fc8c6f64e6cf5e70f97dedd332d claims the package > needs bash. > > It's simply not true. It does not require bash at all, it runs just > fine with busybox's ash shell for example. > How about the start-statd script? It begins with '#!/bin/bash -p'. If you de-bash it, I think we can remove the dependency. //Chen Qi > I don't understand the reasoning behind that commit. There's nothing > in nfs-utils that really needs bash, it runs fine without it. > > > > Also, there is an error in the startup script, I can submit a patch > for that if you like. The script is needlessly complex too. > >