From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (unknown [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B604B605B3 for ; Thu, 22 May 2014 05:24:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s4M5OX0o002968 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 21 May 2014 22:24:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.149] (128.224.162.149) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.169.1; Wed, 21 May 2014 22:24:33 -0700 Message-ID: <537D8A0F.5010705@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 13:24:31 +0800 From: Rongqing Li User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Douglas Royds References: <1400482838-7751-1-git-send-email-rongqing.li@windriver.com> <537D55FE.8090603@taitradio.com> In-Reply-To: <537D55FE.8090603@taitradio.com> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] openssl: fix for CVE-2010-5298 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 05:24:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/22/2014 09:42 AM, Douglas Royds wrote: > On 19/05/14 19:00, rongqing.li@windriver.com wrote: >> From: Yue Tao >> >> Race condition in the ssl3_read_bytes function in s3_pkt.c in OpenSSL >> through 1.0.1g, when SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS is enabled, allows remote >> attackers to inject data across sessions or cause a denial of service >> (use-after-free and parsing error) via an SSL connection in a >> multithreaded environment. >> >> http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2010-5298 >> >> Signed-off-by: Yue Tao >> Signed-off-by: Roy Li >> --- >> .../openssl-1.0.1e/openssl-CVE-2010-5298.patch | 24 >> ++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 >> meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl-1.0.1e/openssl-CVE-2010-5298.patch >> >> >> diff --git >> a/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl-1.0.1e/openssl-CVE-2010-5298.patch >> b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl-1.0.1e/openssl-CVE-2010-5298.patch >> >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..417a774 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ >> b/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl-1.0.1e/openssl-CVE-2010-5298.patch >> >> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ >> +openssl fix for CVE-2010-5298 >> + >> +Upstream-Status: Backport >> + >> +Race condition in the ssl3_read_bytes function in s3_pkt.c in OpenSSL >> +through 1.0.1g, when SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS is enabled, allows remote >> +attackers to inject data across sessions or cause a denial of service >> +(use-after-free and parsing error) via an SSL connection in a >> +multithreaded environment. >> + >> +http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2010-5298 >> + >> +Signed-off-by: Yue Tao >> +--- a/ssl/s3_pkt.c >> ++++ b/ssl/s3_pkt.c >> +@@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ start: >> + { >> + s->rstate=SSL_ST_READ_HEADER; >> + rr->off=0; >> +- if (s->mode & SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS) >> ++ if (s->mode & SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS && >> s->s3->rbuf.left == 0) >> + ssl3_release_read_buffer(s); >> + } >> + } > > This patch file appears to be orphaned in openssl-1.0.1e/, when the > current version is 1.0.1g. > > Also, there is no file://openssl-CVE-2010-5298.patch entry in the SRC_URI. > > Was this deliberate? Am I missing something? thank, I will fix it -Roy -- Best Reagrds, Roy | RongQing Li