From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Greylist: delayed 360 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at layers.openembedded.org; Tue, 27 May 2014 07:04:30 UTC Received: from retry101.mer-nm.internl.net (unknown [217.149.192.107]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036696FA5F for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 07:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp102.mer-nm.internl.net (smtp102.mer-nm.internl.net [IPv6:2a01:3a8:100:2::8a:25]) by retry101.mer-nm.internl.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0971B4003F for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 08:58:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from amavisd-new (mailscanner05.wrt-nm.internl.net [217.149.192.128]) by smtp102.mer-nm.internl.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EC93F4D9 for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 08:58:30 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-scanned: scanned by InterNLnet Mail Scan System X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=4.5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001] autolearn=no X-Spam-Languages: en Received: from smtp102.mer-nm.internl.net ([217.149.192.138]) by amavisd-new (mailscanner05.wrt-nm.internl.net [217.149.192.160]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 08:58:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from TOP-EX01.TOPIC.LOCAL (mail.topic.nl [82.204.13.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp102.mer-nm.internl.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 27 May 2014 08:58:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.80.45] (192.168.80.45) by TOP-EX01.TOPIC.LOCAL (192.168.10.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.181.6; Tue, 27 May 2014 08:58:32 +0200 Message-ID: <53843793.3030309@topic.nl> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 08:58:27 +0200 From: Mike Looijmans User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "OE Core (openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org)" X-Originating-IP: [192.168.80.45] X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 9833cda7-5b21-4d34-9a38-8d025ddc3664 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-BIFURCATION-INSTANCE: 0 Subject: How to find out why shared sstate is not being used for a recipe X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 07:04:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BFI have a deja-vu feeling about this question. I have this recipe: https://github.com/topic-embedded-products/meta-topic/blob/master/recipes-b= sp/fpga/fpga-image-miami.bb Which includes this one: https://github.com/topic-embedded-products/meta-topic/blob/master/recipes-b= sp/fpga/fpga-image.inc I have a build server that exports its sstate-cache directory through HTTP,= =20 and a local host that attempts to use that sstate-cache. This works fine,=20 except for the recipe above. Building this recipe takes about 1 hour, so i= =20 really really really want to share that state at any cost. As you can see,= =20 I've done a big shotgun blast of "vardepdsexclude" to get the recipe to be = as=20 common as possible. Still any host wants to build its own version. How can I diagnose the REASON that my machine thinks it isn't building the= =20 exact same thing as the build server? Met vriendelijke groet / kind regards, Mike Looijmans TOPIC Embedded Systems Eindhovenseweg 32-C, NL-5683 KH Best Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best Telefoon: (+31) (0) 499 33 69 79 Telefax: (+31) (0) 499 33 69 70 E-mail: mike.looijmans@topic.nl Website: www.topic.nl Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail Visit us at MEDTEC Europe 3-5 June, Messe Stuttgart, stand number 5D20 http://medteceurope.com/index.php?page=3Dhome-en