From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C3460CEB for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 21:12:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s61LCQKa010192 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 1 Jul 2014 14:12:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Marks-MacBook-Pro.local (172.25.36.234) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.169.1; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 14:12:26 -0700 Message-ID: <53B32439.6050804@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2014 16:12:25 -0500 From: Mark Hatle Organization: Wind River Systems User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Burton, Ross" References: <7ec8091f15256ddcbadf4051867119ae82d333d3.1404244287.git.mark.hatle@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] db: Uprev to 6.0.30 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 21:12:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 7/1/14, 3:56 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 1 July 2014 21:01, Mark Hatle wrote: >> +LICENSE = "AGPL-3.0" > > Presumably AGPL-v3 has the same clauses that caused > INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSES to exist? > > Does this mean that we should update the documentation to add AGPL-3.0 > to the list of licenses being blacklisted in no-v3 builds, and that in > no-v3 images we can't have rpm on the target? I'm not sure. We likely need someone (with a legal background) to investigate and let us know. Baring that, it's likely that AGPL-3.0 has similar restrictions to GPL v3 and LGPL v3. This might make it worthwhile in keeping the older Sleepycat licensed version around and making related changes to RPM to allow use of the older version if appropriate. --Mark > Ross >