From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166756AC95 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2014 02:26:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s632QNGe025657 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 2 Jul 2014 19:26:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.163.186] (128.224.163.186) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.169.1; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 19:26:22 -0700 Message-ID: <53B4BF4B.5090306@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 10:26:19 +0800 From: Ming Liu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130330 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Saul Wold References: <1404286429-13962-1-git-send-email-ming.liu@windriver.com> <53B45FDC.1050703@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <53B45FDC.1050703@linux.intel.com> X-Originating-IP: [128.224.163.186] Cc: Christopher Larson , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH] initscripts: add usleep support from RHEL X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 02:26:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/03/2014 03:39 AM, Saul Wold wrote: > On 07/02/2014 10:37 AM, Christopher Larson wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Ming Liu >> wrote: >> >>> Add usleep in to support sleeping some number of microseconds. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ming Liu >>> >> >> Maybe it's just me, but initscripts seems like a horrible place to >> put this. >> >> >> > It's not just you! Not sure why it's being added here and I don't see > any usage of it, so more information is required. Why I've sent this is because I noticed there was no usleep binary in any of the packages in oe repositories, and I assumed that the end user might like to use it in their rootfs, so I migrated it from initscripts package of RHEL. Anyway, if all you guys think it's not necessary and not appropriate, I will not insist it, we could just ignore my proposal. :) the best, thank you > > Sau! > >