From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pd0-f173.google.com (mail-pd0-f173.google.com [209.85.192.173]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C13A705AA for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 19:07:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f173.google.com with SMTP id w10so1712272pde.18 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:07:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hXI8AzVqKv5UsOCjUTBu44+hquNirrzI89eRg4KZjuY=; b=cdQuaXRvyL53d9k6248nwVA5qH0SxVMpw6kCJ1drtrJFMR43cBgSIm0Tw0jqkEMBNJ kOsOdi1dKyJa3F+8ChU9bxtwbnOK80fgNLGH1UUHmic7NkgYdvdyyua6N7/62W8R9ece vRUj5ZRVGnruLbeCl2FPko8nOS+GpVJoJcuFYXaEPOPKGAsD0dfllsPoJpHnZPXTNuym 7VUkgsXR84Blc3HgwK3acaJUpsOQiC5i3l7mjjhUd4pN7a8iVGn2QAnXRi601Q0b/fCM Jqm8o5rNqZp3vAMH/17uwMJh7MZ41Pa0E7uIgc/sB90LW5PjTJRj2Yhup1VagJSmm5CU fE7A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnpCAjDNYEV1LYdJKg93kJhWOgzZAeYhdZKFk0bfyjN7oys1+4/YkTBPS30PEJp9pijph4l X-Received: by 10.68.166.36 with SMTP id zd4mr32048429pbb.54.1405537640868; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:07:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.16.1.20] (c-98-239-95-55.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [98.239.95.55]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jt7sm136733pbc.46.2014.07.16.12.07.19 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:07:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53C6CD64.2090807@mvista.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:07:16 -0700 From: akuster User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Burton, Ross" , Richard Purdie References: <1405388483-30716-1-git-send-email-akuster@mvista.com> <1405501880.20402.17.camel@ted> In-Reply-To: Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH] V2 lz4: update to latest version X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 19:07:24 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Did not mean to generate extra work for you all. Thanks for the input. I will go back to the drawing board. regards, Armin On 07/16/2014 06:48 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 16 July 2014 10:11, Richard Purdie > wrote: >> I'm still a little concerned about this change from svn to git. Which is >> the definitive source? It looks like the svn repo is active too? >> >> I just don't want to end up in a position where we're pulling from >> someone's hack'n'dev version of lz4 rather than the place considered the >> real "master" source... > The revision histories *are* different (commits marked "untested" and > then fixed in another commit) but the owner of the git repo is the > same as the owner of the svn repo. It looks like git is his working > area and then changes that have been tested are merged and committed > to git. > > Unless there's a good reason I'd keep with the svn repo for now. > > Ross