From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E63A6084E for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 18:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Aug 2014 11:11:35 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,826,1400050800"; d="scan'208";a="582099878" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.12.111]) ([10.255.12.111]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Aug 2014 11:11:34 -0700 Message-ID: <53E512D6.2070103@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 11:11:34 -0700 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sujith H , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <1407490645-15678-1-git-send-email-sujith.h@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1407490645-15678-1-git-send-email-sujith.h@gmail.com> Cc: Sujith H Subject: Re: [PATCH] opkg-utils: allow disabling update-alternatives X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 18:11:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/08/2014 02:37 AM, Sujith H wrote: > From: Sujith H > > This is needed to deal with the situation where we're using ipk packaging, so > opkg-utils must be built regardless of what update-alternatives provider we > prefer. The downside to the current implementation is the need to adjust > PACKAGECONFIG as well as PREFERRED_PROVIDER, but it is more explicit that way. > > Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson > Signed-off-by: Sujith H > --- > meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_git.bb | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_git.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_git.bb > index 693c216..287bf53 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_git.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg-utils/opkg-utils_git.bb > @@ -19,11 +19,15 @@ TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}" > PYTHONRDEPS = "python python-shell python-io python-math python-crypt python-logging python-fcntl python-subprocess python-pickle python-compression python-textutils python-stringold" > PYTHONRDEPS_class-native = "" > > -PACKAGECONFIG = "python" > +PACKAGECONFIG = "python update-alternatives" > PACKAGECONFIG[python] = ",,,${PYTHONRDEPS}" > +PACKAGECONFIG[update-alternatives] = ",,," > > do_install() { > oe_runmake PREFIX=${prefix} DESTDIR=${D} install > + if ${@'true' if 'update-alternatives' not in PACKAGECONFIG.split() else 'false'}; then > + rm -f "${D}${bindir}/update-alternatives" > + fi Would @bb.utils.contains() be better here? I think that is the correct thing to use. Sau! > } > > PACKAGES =+ "update-alternatives-opkg" >