From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E44F65D57 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7C8iMKo000344 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 12 Aug 2014 01:44:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.163.185] (128.224.163.185) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.174.1; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 01:44:21 -0700 Message-ID: <53E9D3E2.7020101@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:44:18 +0800 From: "Li.Wang" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Burton, Ross" References: <1407824758-9261-1-git-send-email-li.wang@windriver.com> <1407828058-9939-1-git-send-email-li.wang@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [128.224.163.185] Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH] rpcbind: add option to fix port number X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:44:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, this is a description from customer: ===== customer's description of the problem: " It would seem rcpbind opens a random port. Clearly not the most simple thing to protect with an ipfilter. Opening random ports in privileged port range, among them one port that identifies itself as pop3s, is not a good practice. Both Ericsson and our customers run regular vulnerability assessment tools against our product, and this will clearly be seen as a potential problem. Furthermore, we will not be able to filter the ports, since they are random, and neither will we be able to provide decent answers to our customers. To summarize: this should be taken care of, ie fix rpcbind so that it uses a non random port and/or to bind to a specific interface. ===== Thanks, LiWang. On 08/12/2014 04:41 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 12 August 2014 08:20, Li Wang wrote: >> fix a random port to offer customer an option for select. > I'm curious as to why this is needed. > > Ross