From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path:
Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13])
by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E44F65D57
for ;
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:44:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com
[147.11.189.40])
by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7C8iMKo000344
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL);
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 01:44:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.224.163.185] (128.224.163.185) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com
(147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.174.1;
Tue, 12 Aug 2014 01:44:21 -0700
Message-ID: <53E9D3E2.7020101@windriver.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:44:18 +0800
From: "Li.Wang"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Burton, Ross"
References: <1407824758-9261-1-git-send-email-li.wang@windriver.com>
<1407828058-9939-1-git-send-email-li.wang@windriver.com>
In-Reply-To:
X-Originating-IP: [128.224.163.185]
Cc: OE-core
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rpcbind: add option to fix port number
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 08:44:25 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
this is a description from customer:
=====
customer's description of the problem:
"
It would seem rcpbind opens a random port.
Clearly not the most simple thing to protect with an ipfilter.
Opening random ports in privileged port range, among them one port
that
identifies itself as pop3s, is not a good practice. Both Ericsson
and our
customers run regular vulnerability assessment tools against our
product,
and this will clearly be seen as a potential problem. Furthermore,
we will
not be able to filter the ports, since they are random, and neither
will we
be able to provide decent answers to our customers. To summarize: this
should be taken care of, ie fix rpcbind so that it uses a non
random port
and/or to bind to a specific interface.
=====
Thanks,
LiWang.
On 08/12/2014 04:41 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 12 August 2014 08:20, Li Wang wrote:
>> fix a random port to offer customer an option for select.
> I'm curious as to why this is needed.
>
> Ross