From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from p3plsmtpa07-08.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa07-08.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.192.237]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF31610F5 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 11:50:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.65.10] ([66.41.60.82]) by p3plsmtpa07-08.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with id ebqt1o00M1mTNtu01bqu4V; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 04:50:54 -0700 Message-ID: <53ECA29D.10204@pabigot.com> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 06:50:53 -0500 From: "Peter A. Bigot" Organization: Peter Bigot Consulting, LLC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Khem Raj References: <1407963825-20257-1-git-send-email-pab@pabigot.com> <1407963825-20257-3-git-send-email-pab@pabigot.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] gcc-4.8, gcc-4.9: remove inappropriate patch X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 11:50:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 08/13/2014 05:44 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Peter A. Bigot wrote: >> 0037-gcc-4.8-PR56797.patch was originally added as an OE backport during >> 4.8.0. Upstream merged it in 4.8.1, and it was present in 4.9.0. >> >> The original patch still applies to 4.9.1 (and presumably 4.8.2), but >> now is modifying store_multiple_sequence instead of >> load_multiple_sequence (the two functions are nearly identical). It may >> or may not be necessary in store_multiple_sequence, but absent a bug >> report upstream supporting its application in this case, or a least an >> updated comment and upstream status in the patch, I think this patch >> should be dropped. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peter A. Bigot > This looks good. May (should) I add S-o-b lines from you to the V2 series for these or are these informal acks? Peter