Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: akuster808 <akuster808@gmail.com>
To: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] nettle: update nettle to version 3.0
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:27:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53F64823.7070705@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKr7T+64hTcNr6-L=c11RxzX_QPXQioeu6hx5LZatTFx4w@mail.gmail.com>



On 08/21/2014 09:55 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:33 AM, akuster808 <akuster808@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/21/2014 12:38 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 16:06 -0700, Armin Kuster wrote:
>>>>
>>>> With this update, LGPLv3 or GPLv3 where  added to many files.
>>>> Each supported algorithms govern which license they want.
>>>> Many are stated as  "ether v2 or v3 or both in parallel".
>>>> Update license to be v2 or LGPLv3 or GPLv3.
>>>>
>>>> The previous verion had one GPLv3 file so the license was incorrect.
>>>
>>>
>>> With this change, "bitbke gnutls" stops working.
>>>
>>
>>   gnutls is targeting to port to nettle 3.0 in gnutls version 3.4.
>>
>> what should I do?
>
> Revert for now? :)

Its only in the patch queue from what i can tell. Do I ask for it to be 
dropped or do send a 'revert' patch for the patch?

- Armin


  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-21 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-17 23:06 [PATCH v3] nettle: update nettle to version 3.0 Armin Kuster
2014-08-21  7:38 ` Richard Purdie
2014-08-21 14:10   ` akuster808
2014-08-21 14:33   ` akuster808
2014-08-21 16:55     ` Otavio Salvador
2014-08-21 19:27       ` akuster808 [this message]
2014-08-21 20:50         ` Richard Purdie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53F64823.7070705@gmail.com \
    --to=akuster808@gmail.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=otavio@ossystems.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox