From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3119962252 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:10:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8G9AMLc008715 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 16 Sep 2014 02:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.181] (128.224.162.181) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 02:10:21 -0700 Message-ID: <5417FE7C.9070400@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:10:20 +0800 From: Robert Yang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ming Liu , , Richard Purdie References: <1410536356.14624.0.camel@ted> <5417FC26.3080503@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <5417FC26.3080503@windriver.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] sstate: Fix incorrect return value handling X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 09:10:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 09/16/2014 05:00 PM, Ming Liu wrote: > On 09/12/2014 11:39 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: >> The use of [ and && here means $? is reset and the exit 1 error >> interception wasn't working, leading to "file changed as we read it" >> errors from sstate_create_package when heavily using hardlinks. >> >> Fix this by placing $? into a variable. >> >> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie >> >> diff --git a/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass b/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass >> index 0cb5235..1145a63c 100644 >> --- a/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass >> +++ b/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass >> @@ -599,7 +599,8 @@ sstate_create_package () { >> if [ "$(ls -A)" ]; then >> set +e >> tar -czf $TFILE * >> - if [ $? -ne 0 ] && [ $? -ne 1 ]; then >> + ret=$? >> + if [ $ret -ne 0 ] && [ $ret -ne 1 ]; then > Would changing the line to "if [[ $? -ne 0 && $? -ne 1 ]] " be a better fix? I'm afraid not, "[[" and "&&" in test are bashism. // Robert > > the best, > thank you >> exit 1 >> fi >> set -e >> >> >