Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Liu <ming.liu@windriver.com>
To: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sstate: Fix incorrect return value handling
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:15:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5417FF9E.20803@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5417FE7C.9070400@windriver.com>

On 09/16/2014 05:10 PM, Robert Yang wrote:
>
>
> On 09/16/2014 05:00 PM, Ming Liu wrote:
>> On 09/12/2014 11:39 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>> The use of [ and && here means $? is reset and the exit 1 error
>>> interception wasn't working, leading to "file changed as we read it"
>>> errors from sstate_create_package when heavily using hardlinks.
>>>
>>> Fix this by placing $? into a variable.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass b/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass
>>> index 0cb5235..1145a63c 100644
>>> --- a/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass
>>> +++ b/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass
>>> @@ -599,7 +599,8 @@ sstate_create_package () {
>>>       if [ "$(ls -A)" ]; then
>>>           set +e
>>>           tar -czf $TFILE *
>>> -        if [ $? -ne 0 ] && [ $? -ne 1 ]; then
>>> +        ret=$?
>>> +        if [ $ret -ne 0 ] && [ $ret -ne 1 ]; then
>> Would changing the line to "if [[ $? -ne 0  &&  $? -ne 1 ]] " be a 
>> better fix?
>
> I'm afraid not, "[[" and "&&" in test are bashism.
Thanks for pointing it out, please ignore my suggestion then, sorry for 
the noise.

//Ming Liu
>
> // Robert
>
>>
>> the best,
>> thank you
>>>               exit 1
>>>           fi
>>>           set -e
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>



      reply	other threads:[~2014-09-16  9:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-12 15:39 [PATCH] sstate: Fix incorrect return value handling Richard Purdie
2014-09-16  9:00 ` Ming Liu
2014-09-16  9:10   ` Robert Yang
2014-09-16  9:15     ` Ming Liu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5417FF9E.20803@windriver.com \
    --to=ming.liu@windriver.com \
    --cc=liezhi.yang@windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox