From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D249E60103 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:38:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Mar 2018 03:38:03 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.48,330,1517904000"; d="scan'208";a="36201835" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Mar 2018 03:38:02 -0700 To: Marek Vasut References: <20180316092125.64DD7440071@auh.yoctoproject.org> <8f7b8f66-1a17-6051-e626-fc4a3d26c5af@gmail.com> <835df47e-ef32-61a7-f856-eee8dac4610c@gmail.com> From: Alexander Kanavin Message-ID: <5420e82b-7ca0-5dea-659c-208e26e5bc32@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 12:31:20 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <835df47e-ef32-61a7-f856-eee8dac4610c@gmail.com> Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [AUH] u-boot-mkimage: upgrading to 2018.03 FAILED X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:38:03 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/19/2018 12:08 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>> I'm not sure how to solve it - perhaps you can simply take the email as >>>> a reminder to update the whole set on your machine manually? >>> >>> I was hoping the tool will take care of that, now that I've finally >>> plucked all the extra patches out. >> >> You can automate most of the upgrade by running 'devtool upgrade u-boot' >> though. Extra patches are not a problem for automatic updates. If U-BOOT >> and qemu can be made friends, that's even better. > > So what's the problem with qemu and u-boot ? I don't see why it couldn't > be built for qemu targets. Maybe, but right now it's not working, and it's something the u-boot experts should tackle and test. ak@kanavin-desktop:~/development/poky/build$ bitbake u-boot Loading cache: 100% |##########################################################################################################################################################################################################################| Time: 0:00:00 Loaded 1310 entries from dependency cache. ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'u-boot' u-boot was skipped: Either UBOOT_MACHINE or UBOOT_CONFIG must be set in the qemux86 machine configuration. I do see that u-boot has qemu configs though: http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=tree;f=configs;h=a6603a9f312f1e86fa233adf21a51a2c7cf46653;hb=HEAD Alex