From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE72609B2 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 22:48:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8PMmvdA005247 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 15:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msp-dhcp33.wrs.com (172.25.34.33) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 15:48:56 -0700 Message-ID: <54249BD8.1030702@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 17:48:56 -0500 From: Mark Hatle Organization: Wind River Systems User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer References: <1411641352-19058-1-git-send-email-f.deldegan@endian.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH] bash: update to latest (025) patchset (fixes CVE-2014-6271) X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 22:48:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/25/14, 5:40 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > Hu Francesco, > > On 25 September 2014 11:35, Francesco Del Degan wrote: >> Updated to reflect the latest patchset in bash 4.3. >> Fixes the CVE-2014-6271. > > I'm hearing that this isn't a complete fix, so lets wait for more patches. > > Is it possible to cherry-pick just the security fixes, instead of > every patch they've released? > > Finally, patches for oe-core should go to openembedded-core@, not yocto@. > > Ross > Patch 025 fixes CVE-2014-6271, but does NOT fix CVE-2014-7169 or possibly two other issues people are currently looking into. (None of this is confidential BTW.. you can all follow along on the oss-security mailing list.) So I would recommend that someone get the 025 patch (don't forget to patch bash 3.2 as well) in.. and we should wait until their is an official one for 7169. --Mark