Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chong Lu <Chong.Lu@windriver.com>
To: "Burton, Ross" <ross.burton@intel.com>
Cc: OE-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/1] gconf: fix multilib conflict - org.gnome.GConf.service
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 10:40:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <543F3036.9000506@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJTo0LboKNAOi7_tx31+m2KOxF_HEKEGePU2wnHXSzGpoeGTgA@mail.gmail.com>


On 10/15/2014 06:42 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 15 October 2014 03:54, Chong Lu <Chong.Lu@windriver.com> wrote:
>> The gconfd-2 will be called in org.gnome.GConf.service file and the path of
>> gconfd-2 is ${libexecdir}, this will get following error when multilib exported
>> in the sdk:
>> error: file /usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.gnome.GConf.service from install
>> of gconf-3.2.6-r0.0.lib32_x86 conflicts with file from package
>> gconf-3.2.6-r0.0.x86_64
>>
>> Split org.gnome.GConf.service to ${PN}-service, the conflict was fixed.
> Why are both ML variants of gconf being installed?    Presumably for
> libgconf, which needs to have ML variants and is packaged into $PN.
> $PN also contains the binaries and data files, which are not
> ML-specific and can only be installed once.
>
> So, gconf should split the daemon/binaries from the libraries.  I
> suggested this back in July as it seems the logical answer, instead of
> splitting the daemon binary and the service file that defines where
> the binary is.
>
> Ross

Hi Ross,

Sorry, I don't understand your solution.
In org.gnome.GConf.service.in file, it has following line:
Exec=@libexecdir@/gconfd-2

And then, in Makefile.am file:
org.gnome.GConf.service:  $(srcdir)/org.gnome.GConf.service.in
         sed -e 's,[@]libexecdir[@],$(libexecdir),g' \
                 <$(srcdir)/org.gnome.GConf.service.in 
 >org.gnome.GConf.service

In 32bit and 64bit environment, the path of gconfd-2 is different.
So, if we want to install both gconf and lib32-gconf in a image, the 
error will get as above.
In fact, I want to resolve this confliction. Do you have any suggestions?

Best Regards
Chong

>



  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-16  2:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-15  2:54 [PATCH V2 0/1] gconf: fix multilib conflict - org.gnome.GConf.service Chong Lu
2014-10-15  2:54 ` [PATCH V2 1/1] " Chong Lu
2014-10-15 10:42   ` Burton, Ross
2014-10-16  2:40     ` Chong Lu [this message]
2014-10-20  9:19     ` Chong Lu
2014-10-20 12:31       ` Burton, Ross
2014-10-22  6:19         ` Chong Lu
2014-10-20 10:21     ` Koen Kooi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=543F3036.9000506@windriver.com \
    --to=chong.lu@windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=ross.burton@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox