From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DDC6AC49 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 21:50:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2014 14:50:11 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,862,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="408742816" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.13.109]) ([10.255.13.109]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2014 14:42:01 -0700 Message-ID: <5452B292.6050204@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:50:10 -0700 From: Saul Wold User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Barker References: <545281C5.2020004@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: Yocto Project Discussion , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: Package Upgrading for 1.8 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 21:50:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/30/2014 12:07 PM, Paul Barker wrote: > On 30 October 2014 18:21, Saul Wold wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> Just a reminder now that master is open again for patches, now is a great >> time to consider doing package Updates. Based on some rough estimates from >> 1.7 we did around 300 updates from 34 contributors, that got us about 73% >> packages upgrades. >> >> We currently have about 180 packages due to be updated based on the Package >> Reporting from this last week, about 65 of those where not updated in 1.7 so >> should be given some priority (see attached file), there are also 10 that >> need maintainers, let me know if you are interested in any of them. > > I don't see opkg, opkg-utils or libarchive in those emails or on > http://packages.yoctoproject.org/upgradepkgname. Any particular reason > they're missing? > I will look into that, could be that the code in the fetcher is not catching opkg correctly, we are working on updating that code to do a better job. > I'll send an upgrade to opkg v0.2.3 tomorrow, then further upgrades > once they're available. > > Once I've merged a patch by Jian Liu to opkg-utils there will likely > be an opkg-utils SRCREV update. > > I have my eye on libarchive as well as I'm using it within the > development versions of opkg. I'm subscribed to their announcement > mailing list so I'll know when a new release is made. > Thanks, saw your email earlier, thanks your hard work on the OPKG* know it's appreciated. Sau! > Cheers, >