Openembedded Core Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ChenQi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
To: Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] libpam: add system-auth in case of systemd
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 12:47:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5459ABE1.8030000@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5119E558-0182-4F53-80DC-F4E62FA2E42A@dominion.thruhere.net>

On 10/31/2014 03:22 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 31 okt. 2014, om 03:59 heeft ChenQi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>> On 10/30/2014 09:27 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>> Op 30 okt. 2014, om 10:08 heeft Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com> het volgende geschreven:
>>>>
>>>> systemd needs this file to be there because one of its configuration file
>>>> in pam.d, systemd-user, requires it. Otherwise, we would have errors like
>>>> below.
>>>>
>>>>     systemd: PAM _pam_load_conf_file: unable to open /etc/pam.d/system-auth
>>> Isn't it the same as 'common-auth'? ISTR this is due to debian vs fedora naming of PAM stuff. I think it would make more sense to check what systemd actually wants and then see if a symlink to common-auth or patching systemd to use common-auth is the right answer instead of blindly adding system-auth.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> Koen
>>>
>> Hi Koen,
>>
>> An alternative is to patch systemd's source code to change the systemd-user configuration file.
>>
>> In fact, I have seen patches in OE whose purpose is merely changing 'system-auth' to 'common-auth' in the pam configuration files of the packages.
>>
>> So we have two options here:
>> 1. Provide system-auth
>> 2. Patch packages that make use of system-auth and maintain those patches.
>>
>> I think solution 1 is more reasonable but if you and other people in community think that solution 2 can bring us more benefits, I can send out a patch using solution 2.
> Solution 1) introduces a new PAM file that seems to do the same as one of the common-<foo> files we have. So from a reuse and maintainability standpoint 2) would be better.
>
> regards,
>
> Koen
>

Hi Koen,

I've sent out a new patch.
[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] systemd: avoid using system-auth

Best Regards,
Chen Qi

>
>> Best Regards,
>> Chen Qi
>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam/pam.d/system-auth | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>> meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam_1.1.6.bb          |  1 +
>>>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam/pam.d/system-auth
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam/pam.d/system-auth b/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam/pam.d/system-auth
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..ffb08ab
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam/pam.d/system-auth
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
>>>> +# This file comes from systemd.
>>>> +
>>>> +auth     sufficient pam_unix.so nullok try_first_pass
>>>> +
>>>> +account  required   pam_nologin.so
>>>> +account  sufficient pam_unix.so
>>>> +
>>>> +password sufficient pam_unix.so nullok sha512 shadow try_first_pass try_authtok
>>>> +
>>>> +-session optional   pam_loginuid.so
>>>> +-session optional   pam_systemd.so
>>>> +session  sufficient pam_unix.so
>>>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam_1.1.6.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam_1.1.6.bb
>>>> index a84e51e..0910b6f 100644
>>>> --- a/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam_1.1.6.bb
>>>> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/pam/libpam_1.1.6.bb
>>>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ SRC_URI = "http://linux-pam.org/library/Linux-PAM-${PV}.tar.bz2 \
>>>>             file://pam.d/common-session \
>>>>             file://pam.d/common-session-noninteractive \
>>>>             file://pam.d/other \
>>>> +           ${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'systemd', 'file://pam.d/system-auth', '', d)} \
>>>>             file://libpam-xtests.patch \
>>>>             file://destdirfix.patch \
>>>>             file://fixsepbuild.patch \
>>>> -- 
>>>> 1.9.1
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>>>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>>>
>>
>



      reply	other threads:[~2014-11-05  4:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-30  9:08 [PATCH 0/1] libpam: add system-auth in case of systemd Chen Qi
2014-10-30  9:08 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Chen Qi
2014-10-30 13:27   ` Koen Kooi
2014-10-31  2:59     ` ChenQi
2014-10-31  3:04       ` ChenQi
2014-10-31  7:22       ` Koen Kooi
2014-11-05  4:47         ` ChenQi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5459ABE1.8030000@windriver.com \
    --to=qi.chen@windriver.com \
    --cc=koen@dominion.thruhere.net \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox