From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC807029A for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 02:31:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hcb.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.41]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA82Vt4m022020 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 7 Nov 2014 18:31:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.224.162.194] (128.224.162.194) by ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 18:31:55 -0800 Message-ID: <545D8096.5050706@windriver.com> Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 10:31:50 +0800 From: Hongxu Jia User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Burton, Ross" , Martin Jansa References: <16384282a6c5f4878b1c377bbe38cfae1d311d0b.1415346812.git.hongxu.jia@windriver.com> <20141107143813.GF2444@jama> In-Reply-To: Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] avahi.inc: use avahi-daemon as avahi's provider X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 02:32:06 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080805000905060400050500" --------------080805000905060400050500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/07/2014 10:42 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 7 November 2014 14:38, Martin Jansa > wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 03:57:01PM +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote: > > The package avahi does not exist, so we use avahi-daemon as the > provider. > > It avoids the do_rootfs failure while IMAGE_INSTALL += "avahi" > > Why don't you fix your IMAGE_INSTALL instead? > > > Or propose the recipe is changed so that the daemon is in PN (which > rprovides avahi-daemon for compatibility). Providing PN seems like > the worst solution. > Good idea, V2 incoming //Hongxu > Ross --------------080805000905060400050500 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 11/07/2014 10:42 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:

On 7 November 2014 14:38, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 03:57:01PM +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote:
> The package avahi does not exist, so we use avahi-daemon as the provider.
> It avoids the do_rootfs failure while IMAGE_INSTALL += "avahi"

Why don't you fix your IMAGE_INSTALL instead?

Or propose the recipe is changed so that the daemon is in PN (which rprovides avahi-daemon for compatibility).  Providing PN seems like the worst solution.


Good idea, V2 incoming

//Hongxu


Ross

--------------080805000905060400050500--