From: "Peter A. Bigot" <pab@pabigot.com>
To: OE-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: opkg/rpm inconsistencies in multilib image installations
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 10:21:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54677D77.2090104@pabigot.com> (raw)
tl;dr: multilib apparently defines its own root directory underneath
${IMAGE_ROOT} which includes copies of /etc files like passwd that are
not known to pseudo. opkg and rpm differ in whether useradd scripts are
run when a multilib package is installed, resulting in failures to add
users/groups during multilib install when using opkg because a sanity
check thinks they already exist because pseudo is looking somewhere else.
Details:
Ross pointed out in
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2014-November/099032.html
that the patches to prevent using host /etc files in pseudo failed under
multilib and asked me to look into it.
Recall that with these patches PSEUDO_PASSWD (where pseudo looks up
users and groups for getpwnam(3) etc) is set in bitbake.conf to:
PSEUDO_PASSWD ?= "${STAGING_DIR_TARGET}:${STAGING_DIR_NATIVE}"
where STAGING_DIR_NATIVE holds the fallback files that provide only
enough entries to get fs-perms.txt to work before the target staging
/etc exists.
Because images are different and with some packagers base-passwd can't
be installed unless user root can be resolved, in an (updated)
image.bbclass we use this:
# Prefer image, but use the fallback files for lookups if the image ones
# aren't yet available.
PSEUDO_PASSWD = "${IMAGE_ROOTFS}:${STAGING_DIR_NATIVE}"
Adding this line to perform_groupadd in useradd_base.bbclass
bbnote "rootdir $rootdir
PSEUDO_PASSWD=${PSEUDO_PASSWD}=$PSEUDO_PASSWD"
and adding linebreaks for readability, I'm finding that when
lib32-dbus-1 is installed with PACKAGE_CLASSES = "package_ipk" we have:
rootdir
/prj/oe/omap/build-ab-multilib/tmp/work/qemux86_64-poky-linux/core-image-sato/1.0-r0/multilib/lib32
PSEUDO_PASSWD
=/prj/oe/omap/build-ab-multilib/tmp/sysroots/lib32-qemux86-64
:/prj/oe/omap/build-ab-multilib/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux
=/prj/oe/omap/build-ab-multilib/tmp/work/qemux86_64-poky-linux/core-image-sato/1.0-r0/rootfs
:/prj/oe/omap/build-ab-multilib/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux
In other words, useradd.bbclass (1) thinks the etc directory is in $D,
the bitbake variable PSEUDO_PASSWD during build (2) thinks it's in the
multilib 32-bit target staging directory, and the PSEUDO_PASSWD actually
running (3) thinks it's in IMAGE_ROOT.
Because of this, useradd.bbclass can't find netdev in $D/etc/group so
invokes groupadd which does a sanity check and complains that netdev
already exists in ${IMAGE_ROOT}/etc/group and things crumble to a stop.
Interestingly the build+install works with PACKAGE_CLASSES =
"package_rpm" which shows this for the install of
dbus-1-1.8.2-r0.3.core2_64.rpm:
rootdir
/prj/oe/omap/build-ab-multilib/tmp/work/qemux86_64-poky-linux/core-image-sato/1.0-r0/rootfs
PSEUDO_PASSWD
=/prj/oe/omap/build-ab-multilib/tmp/sysroots/qemux86-64
:/prj/oe/omap/build-ab-multilib/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux
=/prj/oe/omap/build-ab-multilib/tmp/work/qemux86_64-poky-linux/core-image-sato/1.0-r0/rootfs
:/prj/oe/omap/build-ab-multilib/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux
and either does not install dbus-1-1.8.2-r0.3.lib32_x86.rpm or somehow
prevents the groupadd scripts from being run.
Whatever's going on here, RPM and OPKG appear to differ in the
environment and selected packages for multilib images, which surely
isn't right. I didn't check deb.
Once somebody reconciles the packager behaviors, I'll return to deal
with any remaining changes to pseudo. If we have to allow multilib to
create users/groups in a non-standard root directory it's gonna get messy.
Peter
next reply other threads:[~2014-11-15 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-15 16:21 Peter A. Bigot [this message]
2014-11-16 0:05 ` opkg/rpm inconsistencies in multilib image installations Peter A. Bigot
2014-11-16 12:59 ` Richard Purdie
2014-11-16 22:52 ` Mark Hatle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54677D77.2090104@pabigot.com \
--to=pab@pabigot.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox