From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (mail.mlbassoc.com [65.100.170.105]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 540A47210C for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 12:14:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 1998) id 81D33F811E3; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 05:14:26 -0700 (MST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hermes.chez-thomas.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 Received: from [192.168.1.114] (zeus [192.168.1.114]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFB4F811D7; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 05:14:25 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <5475C427.10008@mlbassoc.com> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 05:14:31 -0700 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <54758D01.3070601@topic.nl> In-Reply-To: <54758D01.3070601@topic.nl> Subject: Re: Why does building an image for machine X delete the bootloader for machine Y? X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 12:14:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2014-11-26 01:19, Mike Looijmans wrote: > I do a: > > MACHINE=X bitbake my-image > > This DEPENDS on a virtual bootloader, which will produce a BOOT.BIN file in the deploy directory, which is tmp-glibc/deploy.images/X/ > > If I then do a: > > MACHINE=Y bitbake my-image > > the BOOT.BIN in tmp-glibc/deploy.images/X/ is suddenly gone! > > If i do a > > MACHINE=X bitbake my-image > > then the the BOOT.BIN in tmp-glibc/deploy.images/Y/ is suddenly gone, and the one for the X machine appears again. The bootloader recipe is not being rebuilt at all. > > The machines have the same MACHINE_ARCH, they differ on only minor points (the FPGA). > > What is going on here? > What machines are you building for? I've built for two different i.MX6 platforms in the same build tree and I don't see this behaviour. n.b. this was using the latest master Poky/Yocto -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------