From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: qingtao.cao@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rm_work.bbclass: inhibit rm_work per recipe
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:12:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5482882.4phbAeRO1n@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab888a7abe849f3170d5386b577f8a92e8ff5385.1363156578.git.Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 15:01:33 Qi.Chen@windriver.com wrote:
> From: Chen Qi <Qi.Chen@windriver.com>
>
> Use RM_WORK_WHITELIST to inhibit rm_work per recipe. In this way,
> one can use rm_work for the most of the recipes but still keep the
> work area for the recipe(s) one is working on.
>
> As an example, the following settings in local.conf will inhibit
> rm_work for icu-native, icu and busybox.
> INHERIT += "rm_work"
> RM_WORK_WHITELIST += "icu-native icu busybox"
>
> If we comment out the RM_WORK_WHITELIST line and do a rebuild, the
> working area of these recipes will be cleaned up.
This is a great feature, but I just looked at it and realised that the term
"whitelist" isn't really correct - this is more of a blacklist.
The question is does it matter? If so we should probably change it now before
it becomes too hard to change...
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-26 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-13 7:01 [PATCH 0/1] rm_work.bbclass: inhibit rm_work per recipe Qi.Chen
2013-03-13 7:01 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Qi.Chen
2013-03-26 17:12 ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
2013-03-26 17:15 ` Burton, Ross
2013-03-26 17:25 ` Phil Blundell
2013-03-26 17:52 ` Paul Eggleton
2013-04-09 21:01 ` Phil Blundell
2013-04-09 22:55 ` Martin Jansa
2013-03-26 17:55 ` Martin Jansa
2013-03-26 18:02 ` Paul Eggleton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5482882.4phbAeRO1n@helios \
--to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=qingtao.cao@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox