Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Developer workflow improvements

[Trevor Woerner <trevor.woerner@linaro.org>]

On 12/11/14 12:14, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>> It's not supposed to behave this way, although I have reproduced it here - I
>> think I hadn't actually tested rebuilding an image with a recipe in the
>> workspace added to the image. The problem is that the do_compile task is
>> being marked as nostamp, but the way bitbake behaves now, that doesn't
>> cause any dependent task signatures to be changed and thus no dependent
>> tasks get run afterwards. Either I'll have to change that or work out a
>> different way of ensuring do_compile and dependent tasks get run  - either
>> way, you should only have to run a build that calls for the recipe (be it
>> the recipe itself or something that depends upon it), no cleaning/resetting
>> should be needed. I'll try to fix this tomorrow.
> OK, I've fixed this on the branch as well. You should now find that rebuilding 
> the image always triggers a compile -> install -> package etc. of the 
> recipe(s) in the workspace first. (It'll end up triggering other recipes to 
> rebuild as well if they are in the chain; we may have to address that 
> differently later for cases where that's annoying).

Ok great. I've re-tested and it all seems good.