From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED4572677 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:06:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sBH9fMTS011554 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 17 Dec 2014 01:41:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.224.162.231] (128.224.162.231) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.174.1; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 01:41:21 -0800 Message-ID: <54914FC0.9060202@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:41:20 +0800 From: Kang Kai User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fathi Boudra References: <1a6294d4421862267755ac8cd71ffd91cce16902.1415350038.git.kai.kang@windriver.com> <54914493.2030600@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [128.224.162.231] Cc: Koen Kooi , OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/24] libunwind: add aarch64 support X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:06:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2014年12月17日 17:23, Fathi Boudra wrote: > On 17 December 2014 at 10:53, Kang Kai wrote: >> On 2014年12月09日 04:56, Burton, Ross wrote: >>> On 7 November 2014 at 08:51, Kai Kang wrote: >>> >>>> - Support-building-with-older-compilers (fix undefined reference to >>>> `unreachable' on older compilers) >>>> >>> This patch is missing a signed-off-by header, and considering that oe-core >>> has gcc 4.9 do we still need this, or is it specific to a commercial >>> product that is using an older toolchain? > we still need this. > >> It is ok to drop this patch for gcc 4.9. I'll do it. > no, it isn't ok to drop this patch. aarch64 support is still needed in > libunwind. I mean Support-building-with-older-compilers.patch. Do we still need it? --Kai > >> --Kai >> >>> Ross >>> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Neil | Kai Kang > -- Regards, Neil | Kai Kang