From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <Liezhi.Yang@windriver.com>
Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13])
	by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DB872A11
	for <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Thu,  8 Jan 2015 02:05:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hcb.corp.ad.wrs.com
	[147.11.189.41])
	by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t08258k7022189
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL);
	Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:05:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [128.224.162.174] (128.224.162.174) by ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com
	(147.11.189.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1;
	Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:05:07 -0800
Message-ID: <54ADE5D2.1010200@windriver.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 10:05:06 +0800
From: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
References: <54ADE119.6060008@windriver.com>
	<06BCD4D4-D179-401A-A39C-1881F2F69B65@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <06BCD4D4-D179-401A-A39C-1881F2F69B65@gmail.com>
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: About update binutils (2.24 to 2.25)
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 02:05:16 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



On 01/08/2015 09:55 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>> On Jan 7, 2015, at 5:44 PM, Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Khem,
>>
>> I'm trying to upgrade binutils from 2.24 to 2.25, there is
>> a patch binutils/libtool-2.4-update.patch which has 19317
>> lines, do you have any ideas on how did we make it in the past,
>> please ?
>
> what conflicts are you seeing ? if they are just in configure files then you
> need to autoteconf them manually one by one using the appropriate version of auototools as recommended
> for bintutils 2.25 usually gcc/binutils don’t use latest auto tools.

Conflicts in ld/configure, I fixed it manually, I was curious how we made this
patch, and now you have explained, thanks.

// Robert

>
> but if they are reporting changes in other files then its a different problem needs to be looked at.
>
>
>>
>> $ diffstat ./binutils/libtool-2.4-update.patch
>> bfd/configure        | 1314 +++++++++++++++++-----
>> bfd/configure.in     |    2
>> binutils/configure   | 1312 +++++++++++++++++-----
>> configure            |    2
>> gas/configure        | 1312 +++++++++++++++++-----
>> gprof/configure      | 1317 +++++++++++++++++-----
>> ld/configure         | 1693 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> libtool.m4           | 1094 +++++++++++++------
>> ltmain.sh            | 2925 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>> ltoptions.m4         |    2
>> ltversion.m4         |   12
>> lt~obsolete.m4       |    2
>> opcodes/configure    | 1314 +++++++++++++++++-----
>> opcodes/configure.in |    2
>> 14 files changed, 8937 insertions(+), 3366 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> Thanks
>>
>> Robert
>
>
>