From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <Liezhi.Yang@windriver.com>
Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11])
	by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C22BA6AC95
	for <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Fri, 23 Jan 2015 02:12:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com
	[147.11.189.40])
	by mail.windriver.com (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0N2CIqf019575
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL)
	for <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>;
	Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:12:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [128.224.162.174] (128.224.162.174) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com
	(147.11.189.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1;
	Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:12:17 -0800
Message-ID: <54C1AE00.6010402@windriver.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:12:16 +0800
From: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: [RFC] About GPLv2's native recipe
X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
	<openembedded-core.lists.openembedded.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/options/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/>
List-Post: <mailto:openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core>,
	<mailto:openembedded-core-request@lists.openembedded.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 02:12:33 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Hello,

We have several GPLv2 recipes such as m4-native_1.4.9.bb, while we also
have GPLv3's m4-native_1.4.17.bb, I think that we can remove
m4-native_1.4.9.bb if the target m4_1.4.9.bb builds well ?

I'd like to remove it because we don't build the lower native version by
default, and we don't know whether it works or when it would fail.

-- 
Thanks

Robert