From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.twobit.us (smtp.twobit.us [38.83.192.235]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D762718E1 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 05:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-50-185-54-102.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([50.185.54.102] helo=[172.16.1.11]) by smtp.twobit.us with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YFyfF-0004iH-CU; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 05:26:13 +0000 Message-ID: <54C721DB.6050102@twobit.us> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:27:55 -0500 From: Philip Tricca User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Burton, Ross" References: <1421009125-13379-1-git-send-email-flihp@twobit.us> <54B48BB1.1050806@twobit.us> In-Reply-To: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 50.185.54.102 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: flihp@twobit.us X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on smtp.twobit.us X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on smtp.twobit.us) Cc: OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH] python-2.7-manifest: Add package for contextlib module X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 05:28:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/21/2015 06:48 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 13 January 2015 at 03:06, Philip Tricca wrote: > >> Rebased on master before sending. No changes since. Did you mean >> master-next? I wasn't sure which was preferred but I can submit the >> patch on either. >> > > Generally, keep to master. ACK >> https://github.com/flihp/openembedded-core/tree/contextlib >> >> Thanks for taking a look at this and sorry for the confusion. >> > > Thanks for this - I've discovered it was the very long lines being mangled > by email or copy/paste, but taking the commit directly from there works > fine. I should have seen that one coming. git send-email balked at the length of the lines in the patch and I had to pass it the --force flag to get the initial patch to send. Appreciate your persistence, Philip