From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail1.windriver.com (mail1.windriver.com [147.11.146.13]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80CA7147D for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 01:07:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hcb.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.41]) by mail1.windriver.com (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0S17MTb029235 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:07:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.224.162.174] (128.224.162.174) by ALA-HCB.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:07:21 -0800 Message-ID: <54C83648.1060907@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:07:20 +0800 From: Robert Yang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Jansa References: <54C759CD.1030905@windriver.com> <20150127151830.GA2477@jama> In-Reply-To: <20150127151830.GA2477@jama> Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: About subversion_1.8.10.bb and subversion_1.6.15.bb X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 01:07:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 01/27/2015 11:18 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 05:26:37PM +0800, Robert Yang wrote: >> >> We have both subversion_1.8.10.bb and subversion_1.6.15.bb in oe-core >> layer, and their license are the same (Apache-2), does anyone know why >> we need keep subversion_1.6.15.bb, please ? I'd like to remove the old >> one if no objections. > > Different checkout format. Thanks, so I think that we need keep subversion_1.6.15.bb ? // Robert >